[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFBinCBY9SJKOaVYCV2HzDOrjngtcreM4Ftvk+hgr8KAGV_V+Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2019 21:07:42 +0200
From: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>
To: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@...il.com>
Cc: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv1 0/3] Odroid c2 missing regulator linking
Hi Anand,
On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 11:34 AM Anand Moon <linux.amoon@...il.com> wrote:
[...]
> > SCPI works fine on all tested devices, except Odroid-C2, because Hardkernel left
> > the > 1.5GHz freq in the initial SCPI tables loaded by the BL2, i.e. packed with U-Boot.
> > Nowadays they have removed the bad frequencies, but still some devices uses the old
> > bootloader.
> >
> > But in the SCPI case we trust the table returned by the firmware and use it as-in,
> > and there is no (simple ?) way to override the table and set a max frequency.
> >
> > This is why we disabled SCPI.
> >
> > See https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9500175/
>
> I have quickly enable this on my board and here the cpufreq info
[...]
> Almost all the test case pass with this one as off now.
I suggest to send an RFC patch to (re-)enable DVFS on Odroid-C2
I find it easy to miss a DVFS discussion inside a "missing regulator" series
with a separate patch you can also get feedback from other Odroid-C2
owners who can help testing
coincidence or not: on Friday someone asked in the #linux-amlogic IRC
channel why Odroid-C2 didn't have DVFS enabled and what to do about it
Martin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists