lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5d58b4eefc7c4d22b60dd1f6ef51093f@AUSX13MPS306.AMER.DELL.COM>
Date:   Tue, 3 Sep 2019 19:21:07 +0000
From:   <Justin.Lee1@...l.com>
To:     <benwei@...com>, <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:     <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
        <sam@...dozajonas.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next] net/ncsi: support unaligned payload size in
 NC-SI cmd handler

That is right. It is necessary to adjust the len for padding on both places.

Thanks,
Justin


> > > Update NC-SI command handler (both standard and OEM) to take into 
> > > account of payload paddings in allocating skb (in case of payload 
> > > size is not 32-bit aligned).
> > > 
> > > The checksum field follows payload field, without taking payload 
> > > padding into account can cause checksum being truncated, leading to 
> > > dropped packets.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Ben Wei <benwei@...com>
> >
> > If you have to align and add padding, I do not see where you are 
> > clearing out that padding memory to make sure it is initialized.
> >
> > You do comparisons with 'payload' but make adjustments to 'len'.
> >
> > The logic is very confusing.
> 
> Yes let me clarify a bit. 
> 
> In the code 'payload' is the exact NC-SI payload length, which goes into NC-SI packet header and needs to be actual unpadded payload length.
> 
> 'len' is used to allocate total NC-SI packet buffer (include padding). 
> 
> The original calculation of 'len' was done by summing up NCSI header + payload + checksum, without taking into account of possible padding, e.g.
> 
>         len += sizeof(struct ncsi_cmd_pkt_hdr) + 4;  /* 4 is the checksum size */
>        if (nca->payload < 26)
>                 len += 26;
>         else
>                len += nca->payload;
>         /* Allocate skb */
>         skb = alloc_skb(len, GFP_ATOMIC);
> 
> This works today for all standard NC-SI commands (in spec v1.1) because all standard commands have payload size < 26, and packet size is then set to minimum of 46 (16 hdr + 26 payload + 4 cksum) bytes.
> 
> And mem clearing is done in each of the standard cmd handlers, e.g. 
> ncsi_cmd_handler_sp, ncsi_cmd_handler_ae.
> 
> 
> 
> The problem occurs if payload >= 26 and is unaligned.  This could happen on some OEM commands, and I see this happening when we carry PLDM traffic over NC-SI packet. 
> (PLDM header being 3 bytes and payload size can be large) 
> 
> The skb allocated would be too small, and later when checksum is calculated and written:
> 
> 	pchecksum = (__be32 *)((void *)h + sizeof(struct ncsi_pkt_hdr) +
> 		    ALIGN(nca->payload, 4));
> 	*pchecksum = htonl(checksum);
> 
> Part of the checksum would fall outside of our allocated buffer.
> 
> PLDM over NC-SI and OEM NC-SI commands are currently handled in
> 
> @@ -213,17 +213,22 @@ static int ncsi_cmd_handler_oem(struct sk_buff *skb,
> 
> So here I ensure the skb allocation takes padding into account, and do the initial mem clearing to set the padding bytes
> 
> +       unsigned short payload = ALIGN(nca->payload, 4);
> 
>         len = sizeof(struct ncsi_cmd_pkt_hdr) + 4;
> -       if (nca->payload < 26)
> +       if (payload < 26)
>                 len += 26;
>         else
> -               len += nca->payload;
> +               len += payload;
> 
>         cmd = skb_put_zero(skb, len);
>         memcpy(&cmd->mfr_id, nca->data, nca->payload);
> 
> So in this patch I updated both standard command handler (in case future spec updates adds commands with payload >= 26) and OEM/generic command handler to support unaligned payload size.  
> 
> Regards,
> -Ben

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ