linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 111/167] signal/arc: Use force_sig

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190903194526.GH5281@sasha-vm>
Date:   Tue, 3 Sep 2019 15:45:26 -0400
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Vineet Gupta <vgupta@...opsys.com>,
        linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 111/167] signal/arc: Use force_sig_fault
 where appropriate

On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 11:49:16AM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org> writes:
>
>> From: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
>>
>> [ Upstream commit 15773ae938d8d93d982461990bebad6e1d7a1830 ]
>
>To the best of my knowledge this is just a clean up, no changes in
>behavior are present.
>
>The only reason I can see to backport this is so that later fixes could
>be applied cleanly.
>
>So while I have no objections to this patch being backported I don't see
>why you would want to either.

This patch along with the next one came in as a dependency for
a8c715b4dd73c ("ARC: mm: SIGSEGV userspace trying to access kernel
virtual memory").

--
Thanks,
Sasha