[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190903204645.25487-16-lyude@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2019 16:45:53 -0400
From: Lyude Paul <lyude@...hat.com>
To: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org,
amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org
Cc: Juston Li <juston.li@...el.com>, Imre Deak <imre.deak@...el.com>,
Ville Syrjälä
<ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com>, Harry Wentland <hwentlan@....com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 15/27] drm/dp_mst: Cleanup drm_dp_send_link_address() a bit
Declare local pointer to the drm_dp_link_address_ack_reply struct
instead of constantly dereferencing it through the union in
txmsg->reply. Then, invert the order of conditionals so we don't have to
do the bulk of the work inside them, and can wrap lines even less. Then
finally, rearrange variable declarations a bit.
Cc: Juston Li <juston.li@...el.com>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@...el.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Harry Wentland <hwentlan@....com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@...hat.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c | 42 +++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
index 2f88cc173500..d1610434a0cb 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
@@ -2398,9 +2398,9 @@ drm_dp_dump_link_address(struct drm_dp_link_address_ack_reply *reply)
static void drm_dp_send_link_address(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
struct drm_dp_mst_branch *mstb)
{
- int len;
struct drm_dp_sideband_msg_tx *txmsg;
- int ret;
+ struct drm_dp_link_address_ack_reply *reply;
+ int i, len, ret;
txmsg = kzalloc(sizeof(*txmsg), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!txmsg)
@@ -2412,28 +2412,32 @@ static void drm_dp_send_link_address(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
mstb->link_address_sent = true;
drm_dp_queue_down_tx(mgr, txmsg);
+ /* FIXME: Actually do some real error handling here */
ret = drm_dp_mst_wait_tx_reply(mstb, txmsg);
- if (ret > 0) {
- int i;
+ if (ret <= 0) {
+ DRM_ERROR("Sending link address failed with %d\n", ret);
+ goto out;
+ }
+ if (txmsg->reply.reply_type == DP_SIDEBAND_REPLY_NAK) {
+ DRM_ERROR("link address NAK received\n");
+ ret = -EIO;
+ goto out;
+ }
- if (txmsg->reply.reply_type == DP_SIDEBAND_REPLY_NAK) {
- DRM_DEBUG_KMS("link address nak received\n");
- } else {
- DRM_DEBUG_KMS("link address reply: %d\n", txmsg->reply.u.link_addr.nports);
- drm_dp_dump_link_address(&txmsg->reply.u.link_addr);
+ reply = &txmsg->reply.u.link_addr;
+ DRM_DEBUG_KMS("link address reply: %d\n", reply->nports);
+ drm_dp_dump_link_address(reply);
- drm_dp_check_mstb_guid(mstb, txmsg->reply.u.link_addr.guid);
+ drm_dp_check_mstb_guid(mstb, reply->guid);
- for (i = 0; i < txmsg->reply.u.link_addr.nports; i++) {
- drm_dp_add_port(mstb, mgr->dev, &txmsg->reply.u.link_addr.ports[i]);
- }
- drm_kms_helper_hotplug_event(mgr->dev);
- }
- } else {
- mstb->link_address_sent = false;
- DRM_DEBUG_KMS("link address failed %d\n", ret);
- }
+ for (i = 0; i < reply->nports; i++)
+ drm_dp_add_port(mstb, mgr->dev, &reply->ports[i]);
+
+ drm_kms_helper_hotplug_event(mgr->dev);
+out:
+ if (ret <= 0)
+ mstb->link_address_sent = false;
kfree(txmsg);
}
--
2.21.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists