lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4hyEK=jA=ATyzjKbJDeQfpOyRo4pxoFCTf1LHa-muC14w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 2 Sep 2019 22:31:00 -0700
From:   Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the hmm tree

On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 4:45 PM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Hi Jason,
>
> On Mon, 2 Sep 2019 10:51:41 +0000 Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 08:50:17PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> >
> > > ERROR: "nd_region_provider_data" [drivers/acpi/nfit/nfit.ko] undefined!
> > > ERROR: "to_nd_blk_region" [drivers/acpi/nfit/nfit.ko] undefined!
> > > ERROR: "nvdimm_region_notify" [drivers/acpi/nfit/nfit.ko] undefined!
> > > ERROR: "nvdimm_blk_region_create" [drivers/acpi/nfit/nfit.ko] undefined!
> > >
> > > Caused by commit
> > >
> > >   126470c8a58b ("libnvdimm: Enable unit test infrastructure compile checks")
> > >
> > > I have reverted that commit for today.
> >
> > Looks like more kconfig trouble, can you send Dan your kconfig? I'll
> > drop this patch again
> >
>
> Thanks.  It was just an x86_64 allmodconfig build.  I don't actually
> have the .config file (it gets cleaned up, sorry).

Strange. x86_64 allmodconfig is certainly a 0day build target. Could
this be toolchain dependent?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ