[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPM=9tx1vQMEsw4VjDVCbDYFUiaeHNCfP09aiSxnPnucQuB1JQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2019 07:35:59 +1000
From: Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>
To: Lyude Paul <lyude@...hat.com>
Cc: dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
nouveau <nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
amd-gfx mailing list <amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
Imre Deak <imre.deak@...el.com>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Juston Li <juston.li@...el.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Harry Wentland <hwentlan@....com>,
Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/27] drm/dp_mst: Combine redundant cases in drm_dp_encode_sideband_req()
On Wed, 4 Sep 2019 at 06:48, Lyude Paul <lyude@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> Noticed this while working on adding a drm_dp_decode_sideband_req().
> DP_POWER_DOWN_PHY/DP_POWER_UP_PHY both use the same struct, so we can
> just combine their cases.
both use the same struct as enum path resources?
Since otherwise the patch doesn't make sense.
With that fixed:
Reviewed-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@...hat.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists