linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 11/11] smack: Implement the watch_key and post

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <23d61564-026e-b37a-8b16-ce68d5949f6c@schaufler-ca.com>
Date:   Tue, 3 Sep 2019 15:16:08 -0700
From:   Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>
To:     David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc:     viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com, raven@...maw.net,
        Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>,
        keyrings@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        casey@...aufler-ca.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/11] smack: Implement the watch_key and
 post_notification hooks [untested] [ver #7]

On 9/3/2019 11:06 AM, David Howells wrote:
> Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com> wrote:
>
>> Built from your tree.
> What branch?  keys-next?

I rebuilt with keys-next, updated the tests again, and now
the suite looks to be running trouble free. I do see a message
SKIP DUE TO DISABLED SELINUX which I take to mean that there
is an SELinux specific test.

>
>> keyctl move 483362336 1065401533 @s
>> keyctl_move: Operation not supported
> Odd.  That should be unconditional if you have CONFIG_KEYS and v5.3-rc1.  Can
> you try:
>
> 	keyctl supports
>
> or just:
>
> 	keyctl add user a a @s
>
> which will give you an id, say 1234, then:
>
> 	keyctl move 1234 @s @u
>
> see if that works.
>
> David