linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] perf cs-etm: Refactor instruction size handling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190903222215.GD25787@xps15>
Date:   Tue, 3 Sep 2019 16:22:15 -0600
From:   Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
To:     Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
Cc:     Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>,
        Robert Walker <Robert.Walker@....com>,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] perf cs-etm: Refactor instruction size handling

On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 02:24:19PM +0800, Leo Yan wrote:
> There has several code pieces need to know the instruction size, but
> now every place calculates the instruction size separately.
> 
> This patch refactors to create a new function cs_etm__instr_size() as
> a central place to analyze the instruction length based on ISA type
> and instruction value.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
> ---
>  tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>  1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c b/tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c
> index b3a5daaf1a8f..882a0718033d 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c
> @@ -914,6 +914,26 @@ static inline int cs_etm__t32_instr_size(struct cs_etm_queue *etmq,
>  	return ((instrBytes[1] & 0xF8) >= 0xE8) ? 4 : 2;
>  }
>  
> +static inline int cs_etm__instr_size(struct cs_etm_queue *etmq,
> +				     u8 trace_chan_id,
> +				     enum cs_etm_isa isa,
> +				     u64 addr)
> +{
> +	int insn_len;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * T32 instruction size might be 32-bit or 16-bit, decide by calling
> +	 * cs_etm__t32_instr_size().
> +	 */
> +	if (isa == CS_ETM_ISA_T32)
> +		insn_len = cs_etm__t32_instr_size(etmq, trace_chan_id, addr);
> +	/* Otherwise, A64 and A32 instruction size are always 32-bit. */
> +	else
> +		insn_len = 4;
> +
> +	return insn_len;
> +}
> +
>  static inline u64 cs_etm__first_executed_instr(struct cs_etm_packet *packet)
>  {
>  	/* Returns 0 for the CS_ETM_DISCONTINUITY packet */
> @@ -938,19 +958,23 @@ static inline u64 cs_etm__instr_addr(struct cs_etm_queue *etmq,
>  				     const struct cs_etm_packet *packet,
>  				     u64 offset)
>  {
> +	int insn_len;
> +
>  	if (packet->isa == CS_ETM_ISA_T32) {
>  		u64 addr = packet->start_addr;
>  
>  		while (offset > 0) {
> -			addr += cs_etm__t32_instr_size(etmq,
> -						       trace_chan_id, addr);
> +			addr += cs_etm__instr_size(etmq, trace_chan_id,
> +						   packet->isa, addr);
>  			offset--;
>  		}
>  		return addr;
>  	}
>  
> -	/* Assume a 4 byte instruction size (A32/A64) */
> -	return packet->start_addr + offset * 4;
> +	/* Return instruction size for A32/A64 */
> +	insn_len = cs_etm__instr_size(etmq, trace_chan_id,
> +				      packet->isa, packet->start_addr);
> +	return packet->start_addr + offset * insn_len;

This patch will work but from where I stand it makes things difficult to
understand more than anything else.  It is also adding coupling between function
cs_etm__instr_addr() and cs_etm__instr_size(), meaning the code needs to be
carefully inspected in order to make changes to either one.

Last but not least function cs_etm__instr_size() isn't used in the upcoming
patches.  I really don't see what is gained here. 
 
Thanks,
Mathieu

>  }
>  
>  static void cs_etm__update_last_branch_rb(struct cs_etm_queue *etmq,
> @@ -1090,16 +1114,8 @@ static void cs_etm__copy_insn(struct cs_etm_queue *etmq,
>  		return;
>  	}
>  
> -	/*
> -	 * T32 instruction size might be 32-bit or 16-bit, decide by calling
> -	 * cs_etm__t32_instr_size().
> -	 */
> -	if (packet->isa == CS_ETM_ISA_T32)
> -		sample->insn_len = cs_etm__t32_instr_size(etmq, trace_chan_id,
> -							  sample->ip);
> -	/* Otherwise, A64 and A32 instruction size are always 32-bit. */
> -	else
> -		sample->insn_len = 4;
> +	sample->insn_len = cs_etm__instr_size(etmq, trace_chan_id,
> +					      packet->isa, sample->ip);
>  
>  	cs_etm__mem_access(etmq, trace_chan_id, sample->ip,
>  			   sample->insn_len, (void *)sample->insn);
> -- 
> 2.17.1
>