[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1567551071.4937.5.camel@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2019 18:51:11 -0400
From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Nayna Jain <nayna@...ux.ibm.com>, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Jeremy Kerr <jk@...abs.org>,
Matthew Garret <matthew.garret@...ula.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Claudio Carvalho <cclaudio@...ux.ibm.com>,
George Wilson <gcwilson@...ux.ibm.com>,
Elaine Palmer <erpalmer@...ibm.com>,
Eric Ricther <erichte@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Oliver O'Halloran" <oohall@...il.com>,
Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...oraproject.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] x86/efi: move common keyring handler functions
to new file
(Cc'ing Josh Boyer, David Howells)
On Mon, 2019-09-02 at 21:55 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Nayna Jain <nayna@...ux.ibm.com> writes:
>
> > The handlers to add the keys to the .platform keyring and blacklisted
> > hashes to the .blacklist keyring is common for both the uefi and powerpc
> > mechanisms of loading the keys/hashes from the firmware.
> >
> > This patch moves the common code from load_uefi.c to keyring_handler.c
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nayna Jain <nayna@...ux.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>
> > ---
> > security/integrity/Makefile | 3 +-
> > .../platform_certs/keyring_handler.c | 80 +++++++++++++++++++
> > .../platform_certs/keyring_handler.h | 32 ++++++++
> > security/integrity/platform_certs/load_uefi.c | 67 +---------------
> > 4 files changed, 115 insertions(+), 67 deletions(-)
> > create mode 100644 security/integrity/platform_certs/keyring_handler.c
> > create mode 100644 security/integrity/platform_certs/keyring_handler.h
>
> This has no acks from security folks, though I'm not really clear on who
> maintains those files.
I upstreamed David's, Josh's, and Nayna's patches, so that's probably
me.
> Do I take it because it's mostly just code movement people are OK with
> it going in via the powerpc tree?
Yes, the only reason for splitting load_uefi.c is for powerpc. These
patches should be upstreamed together.
Mimi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists