[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190903084921.zikiucdruymfgfsq@kamzik.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2019 10:49:21 +0200
From: Andrew Jones <drjones@...hat.com>
To: Steven Price <steven.price@....com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@...il.com>,
Suzuki K Pouloze <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/10] arm64: Stolen time support
On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 10:03:48AM +0200, Andrew Jones wrote:
> Hi Steven,
>
> I had some fun testing this series with the KVM selftests framework. It
> looks like it works to me, so you may add
>
> Tested-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@...hat.com>
>
Actually, I probably shouldn't be quite so generous with this tag yet,
because I haven't yet tested the guest-side changes. To do that I'll
need to start prototyping something for QEMU. I need to finish some other
stuff first, but then I can do that.
Thanks,
drew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists