[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190903085904.bwmm4knaodopvzvd@pburton-laptop>
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2019 09:07:51 +0000
From: Paul Burton <paul.burton@...s.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>
CC: "open list:MIPS" <linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>,
Huacai Chen <chenhc@...ote.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....co>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/13] dt-bindings: mips: Add loongson cpus & boards
Hi Rob,
On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 03:50:47PM +0100, Rob Herring wrote:
> > In general on MIPS we detect CPU properties at runtime from coprocessor
> > 0 registers & similar sources of information, so there's not really a
> > need to specify anything about the CPU in devicetree.
>
> We thought the same thing initially for Arm... Mostly what is in DT is
> not what is discoverable. Are clock speeds, power domains, low power
> states, etc. all discoverable?
No, that's a good point - clocks etc may need to be specified in DT. I
just don't see any of that in this patchset - it appears all that is
specified is cache sizes which we already detect. So in this case I
don't see a need for including CPUs in DT at all.
Jiaxun - did you add all this information to DT to avoid the "cacheinfo:
Unable to detect cache hierarchy for CPU" messages during boot? If so
that should be fixed by commit b8bea8a5e5d9 ("mips: fix cacheinfo"). If
not, could you describe why the CPU nodes are needed here?
Thanks,
Paul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists