linux-kernel - [PATCH 12/20] riscv: implement remote sfence.i using IPIs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190903093239.21278-13-hch@lst.de>
Date:   Tue,  3 Sep 2019 11:32:31 +0200
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:     Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...ive.com>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>
Cc:     Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@....com>,
        linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 12/20] riscv: implement remote sfence.i using IPIs

The RISC-V ISA only supports flushing the instruction cache for the
local CPU core.  Currently we always offload the remote TLB flushing to
the SBI, which then issues an IPI under the hoods.  But with M-mode
we do not have an SBI so we have to do it ourselves.   IPI to the
other nodes using the existing kernel helpers instead if we have
native clint support and thus can IPI directly from the kernel.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
---
 arch/riscv/include/asm/sbi.h |  3 +++
 arch/riscv/mm/cacheflush.c   | 24 ++++++++++++++++++------
 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/sbi.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/sbi.h
index b167af3e7470..0cb74eccc73f 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/sbi.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/sbi.h
@@ -94,5 +94,8 @@ static inline void sbi_remote_sfence_vma_asid(const unsigned long *hart_mask,
 {
 	SBI_CALL_4(SBI_REMOTE_SFENCE_VMA_ASID, hart_mask, start, size, asid);
 }
+#else /* CONFIG_RISCV_SBI */
+/* stub to for code is only reachable under IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RISCV_SBI): */
+void sbi_remote_fence_i(const unsigned long *hart_mask);
 #endif /* CONFIG_RISCV_SBI */
 #endif /* _ASM_RISCV_SBI_H */
diff --git a/arch/riscv/mm/cacheflush.c b/arch/riscv/mm/cacheflush.c
index 3f15938dec89..794c9ab256eb 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/mm/cacheflush.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/mm/cacheflush.c
@@ -10,9 +10,17 @@
 
 #include <asm/sbi.h>
 
+static void ipi_remote_fence_i(void *info)
+{
+	return local_flush_icache_all();
+}
+
 void flush_icache_all(void)
 {
-	sbi_remote_fence_i(NULL);
+	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RISCV_SBI))
+		sbi_remote_fence_i(NULL);
+	else
+		on_each_cpu(ipi_remote_fence_i, NULL, 1);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -28,7 +36,7 @@ void flush_icache_all(void)
 void flush_icache_mm(struct mm_struct *mm, bool local)
 {
 	unsigned int cpu;
-	cpumask_t others, hmask, *mask;
+	cpumask_t others, *mask;
 
 	preempt_disable();
 
@@ -46,10 +54,7 @@ void flush_icache_mm(struct mm_struct *mm, bool local)
 	 */
 	cpumask_andnot(&others, mm_cpumask(mm), cpumask_of(cpu));
 	local |= cpumask_empty(&others);
-	if (mm != current->active_mm || !local) {
-		riscv_cpuid_to_hartid_mask(&others, &hmask);
-		sbi_remote_fence_i(hmask.bits);
-	} else {
+	if (mm == current->active_mm && local) {
 		/*
 		 * It's assumed that at least one strongly ordered operation is
 		 * performed on this hart between setting a hart's cpumask bit
@@ -59,6 +64,13 @@ void flush_icache_mm(struct mm_struct *mm, bool local)
 		 * with flush_icache_deferred().
 		 */
 		smp_mb();
+	} else if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RISCV_SBI)) {
+		cpumask_t hartid_mask;
+
+		riscv_cpuid_to_hartid_mask(&others, &hartid_mask);
+		sbi_remote_fence_i(cpumask_bits(&hartid_mask));
+	} else {
+		on_each_cpu_mask(&others, ipi_remote_fence_i, NULL, 1);
 	}
 
 	preempt_enable();
-- 
2.20.1