lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190903131416.GA26756@infradead.org>
Date:   Tue, 3 Sep 2019 06:14:16 -0700
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:     Andrei Leonvikov <andreil499@...il.com>
Cc:     bhelgaas@...gle.com, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Fix ARI enabling for a NVME devices

On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 12:53:15PM +0000, Andrei Leonvikov wrote:
> +	if ((dev->driver != NULL) && (strncmp(dev->driver->name, "nvme", 4) == 0)) {
> +		// for NVME device this field always zero, but ARI can be enabled
> +		pcie_capability_read_dword(bridge, PCI_EXP_DEVCAP2, &cap);
> +		if (!(cap & PCI_EXP_DEVCAP2_ARI))
> +			return;
> +	}

Besides the missing patch description, all the obvious style issues, and
the fact that you can't just check a driver name a here:

There are plenty NVMe drives that support the ARI capability, and I
don't know of any standard saying nvme device should be treated special.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ