[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <481b2921-760a-c0f3-489b-2b9c5f792883@hpe.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2019 07:17:56 -0700
From: Mike Travis <mike.travis@....com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dimitri Sivanich <dimitri.sivanich@....com>,
Russ Anderson <russ.anderson@....com>,
Hedi Berriche <hedi.berriche@....com>,
Steve Wahl <steve.wahl@....com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] x86/platform/UV: Update UV Hubless System Support
On 9/3/2019 12:47 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Mike Travis <mike.travis@....com> wrote:
>
>>
>> These patches support upcoming UV systems that do not have a UV HUB.
>>
>> * Save OEM_ID from ACPI MADT probe
>> * Return UV Hubless System Type
>> * Add return code to UV BIOS Init function
>> * Setup UV functions for Hubless UV Systems
>> * Add UV Hubbed/Hubless Proc FS Files
>> * Decode UVsystab Info
>> * Account for UV Hubless in is_uvX_hub Ops
>
> Beyond addressing Christoph's feedback, please also make sure the series
> applies cleanly to tip:master, because right now it doesn't.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ingo
>
I will do this, and retest. Currently we are using the latest upstream
version but obviously that thinking is flawed, since we are hoping to
get into the next merge period.
I also noticed that the MAINTAINERS list for UV is out of date, I will
tend to that too.
Thanks,
Mike
Powered by blists - more mailing lists