linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] sched/debug: add sched_update_nr

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a2924d91-df68-42de-0709-af53649346d5@arm.com>
Date:   Tue, 3 Sep 2019 17:05:47 +0100
From:   Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>
To:     Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Jirka Hladký <jhladky@...hat.com>,
        Jiří Vozár <jvozar@...hat.com>,
        x86@...nel.org, Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] sched/debug: add sched_update_nr_running tracepoint

On 03/09/2019 16:43, Radim Krčmář wrote:
> The paper "The Linux Scheduler: a Decade of Wasted Cores" used several
> custom data gathering points to better understand what was going on in
> the scheduler.
> Red Hat adapted one of them for the tracepoint framework and created a
> tool to plot a heatmap of nr_running, where the sched_update_nr_running
> tracepoint is being used for fine grained monitoring of scheduling
> imbalance.
> The tool is available from https://github.com/jirvoz/plot-nr-running.
> 
> The best place for the tracepoints is inside the add/sub_nr_running,
> which requires some shenanigans to make it work as they are defined
> inside sched.h.
> The tracepoints have to be included from sched.h, which means that
> CREATE_TRACE_POINTS has to be defined for the whole header and this
> might cause problems if tree-wide headers expose tracepoints in sched.h
> dependencies, but I'd argue it's the other side's misuse of tracepoints.
> 
> Moving the import sched.h line lower would require fixes in s390 and ppc
> headers, because they don't include dependecies properly and expect
> sched.h to do it, so it is simpler to keep sched.h there and
> preventively undefine CREATE_TRACE_POINTS right after.
> 
> Exports of the pelt tracepoints remain because they don't need to be
> protected by CREATE_TRACE_POINTS and moving them closer would be
> unsightly.
> 

Pure trace events are frowned upon in scheduler world, try going with
trace points. Qais did something very similar recently:

https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190604111459.2862-1-qais.yousef@arm.com/

You'll have to implement the associated trace events in a module, which
lets you define your own event format and doesn't form an ABI :).