lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f73c8da9fe417eb07137baac9c96dc0e0b6f63a3.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 03 Sep 2019 19:10:50 +0300
From:   Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Seunghun Han <kkamagui@...il.com>
Cc:     "Safford, David (GE Global Research, US)" <david.safford@...com>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
        Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@....de>,
        "open list:TPM DEVICE DRIVER" <linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] tpm: tpm_crb: enhance resource mapping mechanism
 for supporting AMD's fTPM

On Tue, 2019-09-03 at 07:42 +0900, Seunghun Han wrote:
> I have a question. Do you think this patch is not enough to handle
> AMD's fTPM problem? If so, would you tell me about it? I will change
> my patch.

I have no new feedback to give at this point and no absolutely time to
brainstorm new ideas.

You've now sent the same patch set version twice. The one that was
sent 8-30 has the same patch version and no change log so no action
taken from my part.

Please version your patch sets and keep the change log in the cover
letter.

/Jarkko

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ