linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 00/10] arm64: Stolen time support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 4 Sep 2019 17:02:03 +0100
From:   Steven Price <steven.price@....com>
To:     Andrew Jones <drjones@...hat.com>
Cc:     Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
        Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@...il.com>,
        Suzuki K Pouloze <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/10] arm64: Stolen time support

On 03/09/2019 09:49, Andrew Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 10:03:48AM +0200, Andrew Jones wrote:
>> Hi Steven,
>>
>> I had some fun testing this series with the KVM selftests framework. It
>> looks like it works to me, so you may add
>>
>> Tested-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@...hat.com>
>>
> 
> Actually, I probably shouldn't be quite so generous with this tag yet,
> because I haven't yet tested the guest-side changes. To do that I'll
> need to start prototyping something for QEMU. I need to finish some other
> stuff first, but then I can do that.

Thanks for the testing, I'll wait for your other testing before adding
your Tested-by tag.

Steve