[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190904160122.4179-8-sashal@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2019 12:00:54 -0400
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Juliana Rodrigueiro <juliana.rodrigueiro@...ra2net.com>,
Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, coreteam@...filter.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.14 08/36] netfilter: xt_nfacct: Fix alignment mismatch in xt_nfacct_match_info
From: Juliana Rodrigueiro <juliana.rodrigueiro@...ra2net.com>
[ Upstream commit 89a26cd4b501e9511d3cd3d22327fc76a75a38b3 ]
When running a 64-bit kernel with a 32-bit iptables binary, the size of
the xt_nfacct_match_info struct diverges.
kernel: sizeof(struct xt_nfacct_match_info) : 40
iptables: sizeof(struct xt_nfacct_match_info)) : 36
Trying to append nfacct related rules results in an unhelpful message.
Although it is suggested to look for more information in dmesg, nothing
can be found there.
# iptables -A <chain> -m nfacct --nfacct-name <acct-object>
iptables: Invalid argument. Run `dmesg' for more information.
This patch fixes the memory misalignment by enforcing 8-byte alignment
within the struct's first revision. This solution is often used in many
other uapi netfilter headers.
Signed-off-by: Juliana Rodrigueiro <juliana.rodrigueiro@...ra2net.com>
Acked-by: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
include/uapi/linux/netfilter/xt_nfacct.h | 5 ++++
net/netfilter/xt_nfacct.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++--------
2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/netfilter/xt_nfacct.h b/include/uapi/linux/netfilter/xt_nfacct.h
index 5c8a4d760ee34..b5123ab8d54a8 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/netfilter/xt_nfacct.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/netfilter/xt_nfacct.h
@@ -11,4 +11,9 @@ struct xt_nfacct_match_info {
struct nf_acct *nfacct;
};
+struct xt_nfacct_match_info_v1 {
+ char name[NFACCT_NAME_MAX];
+ struct nf_acct *nfacct __attribute__((aligned(8)));
+};
+
#endif /* _XT_NFACCT_MATCH_H */
diff --git a/net/netfilter/xt_nfacct.c b/net/netfilter/xt_nfacct.c
index 6f92d25590a85..ea447b437f122 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/xt_nfacct.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/xt_nfacct.c
@@ -55,25 +55,39 @@ nfacct_mt_destroy(const struct xt_mtdtor_param *par)
nfnl_acct_put(info->nfacct);
}
-static struct xt_match nfacct_mt_reg __read_mostly = {
- .name = "nfacct",
- .family = NFPROTO_UNSPEC,
- .checkentry = nfacct_mt_checkentry,
- .match = nfacct_mt,
- .destroy = nfacct_mt_destroy,
- .matchsize = sizeof(struct xt_nfacct_match_info),
- .usersize = offsetof(struct xt_nfacct_match_info, nfacct),
- .me = THIS_MODULE,
+static struct xt_match nfacct_mt_reg[] __read_mostly = {
+ {
+ .name = "nfacct",
+ .revision = 0,
+ .family = NFPROTO_UNSPEC,
+ .checkentry = nfacct_mt_checkentry,
+ .match = nfacct_mt,
+ .destroy = nfacct_mt_destroy,
+ .matchsize = sizeof(struct xt_nfacct_match_info),
+ .usersize = offsetof(struct xt_nfacct_match_info, nfacct),
+ .me = THIS_MODULE,
+ },
+ {
+ .name = "nfacct",
+ .revision = 1,
+ .family = NFPROTO_UNSPEC,
+ .checkentry = nfacct_mt_checkentry,
+ .match = nfacct_mt,
+ .destroy = nfacct_mt_destroy,
+ .matchsize = sizeof(struct xt_nfacct_match_info_v1),
+ .usersize = offsetof(struct xt_nfacct_match_info_v1, nfacct),
+ .me = THIS_MODULE,
+ },
};
static int __init nfacct_mt_init(void)
{
- return xt_register_match(&nfacct_mt_reg);
+ return xt_register_matches(nfacct_mt_reg, ARRAY_SIZE(nfacct_mt_reg));
}
static void __exit nfacct_mt_exit(void)
{
- xt_unregister_match(&nfacct_mt_reg);
+ xt_unregister_matches(nfacct_mt_reg, ARRAY_SIZE(nfacct_mt_reg));
}
module_init(nfacct_mt_init);
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists