[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190904161348.GE4348@sirena.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2019 17:13:48 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>, f.fainelli@...il.com,
rjui@...adcom.com, sbranden@...adcom.com, eric@...olt.net,
wahrenst@....net, shc_work@...l.ru, agross@...nel.org,
khilman@...libre.com, matthias.bgg@...il.com, shawnguo@...nel.org,
s.hauer@...gutronix.de, kernel@...gutronix.de, festevam@...il.com,
linux-imx@....com, avifishman70@...il.com, tmaimon77@...il.com,
tali.perry1@...il.com, venture@...gle.com, yuenn@...gle.com,
benjaminfair@...gle.com, kgene@...nel.org,
Andi Shyti <andi@...zian.org>, palmer@...ive.com,
paul.walmsley@...ive.com, baohua@...nel.org, mripard@...nel.org,
wens@...e.org, ldewangan@...dia.com, thierry.reding@...il.com,
jonathanh@...dia.com, yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com,
michal.simek@...inx.com, bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org,
"linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next 25/36] spi: s3c24xx: use
devm_platform_ioremap_resource() to simplify code
On Wed, Sep 04, 2019 at 05:09:45PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Sep 2019 at 16:39, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
> > I think it's reasonable, it's giving credit to the automated system
> > they've got running coccinelle (which they do mention in their commit
> > logs). It doesn't really hurt anyone and lets people see their system
> > is finding stuff.
> Running internally coccinelle is already credited with commit author.
> The credits are coming with "From:" field.
I guess if other people look at the same CI and send patches as well
then there's some use tying them all together.
> Otherwise for commits I send I could use:
> From: krzk
> ...
> Reported-by: www.krzk.eu
> Signed-off-by: krzk
> To me it is ridiculous.
Sure, on the other hand it doesn't really cost anyone anything if you do
that.
> Different thing is that Reported-by is for fixing bugs or issues.
> There is no bug here. There is no problem solved except making the
> code smaller. That's not what is Reported-by for.
That is true, this one isn't fixing any bug but then the line does get a
bit fuzzy all round with things like warnings and coccinelle output -
even just having the warning pop up is noise for people looking at the
output even if there's no concrete problem. Again I don't see it as
something that's worth getting worked up over.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists