Message-ID: <CAAeHK+ybMvTNB8_fQxNqhb0s0Swr61XPHu3CvEUQxi2vHW6anw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 4 Sep 2019 18:42:45 +0200
From:   Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>
To:     Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>
Cc:     Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" 
        <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Yishai Hadas <yishaih@...lanox.com>,
        Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@....com>,
        Alexander Deucher <Alexander.Deucher@....com>,
        Christian Koenig <Christian.Koenig@....com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@...aro.org>,
        Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
        Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
        Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@...il.com>,
        Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>,
        Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@...cle.com>, enh <enh@...gle.com>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
        Kostya Serebryany <kcc@...gle.com>,
        Evgeniy Stepanov <eugenis@...gle.com>,
        Lee Smith <Lee.Smith@....com>,
        Ramana Radhakrishnan <Ramana.Radhakrishnan@....com>,
        Jacob Bramley <Jacob.Bramley@....com>,
        Ruben Ayrapetyan <Ruben.Ayrapetyan@....com>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@....com>,
        Szabolcs Nagy <Szabolcs.Nagy@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v18 15/15] selftests, arm64: add a selftest for passing
 tagged pointers to kernel

On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 6:22 PM Cristian Marussi
<cristian.marussi@....com> wrote:
>
> Hi Andrey !
>
> On 04/09/2019 15:52, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 7:49 PM Cristian Marussi
> > <cristian.marussi@....com> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> On 23/08/2019 18:16, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 3:56 PM Cristian Marussi
> >>> <cristian.marussi@....com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi Andrey
> >>>>
> >>>> On 24/06/2019 15:33, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
> >>>>> This patch is a part of a series that extends kernel ABI to allow to pass
> >>>>> tagged user pointers (with the top byte set to something else other than
> >>>>> 0x00) as syscall arguments.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This patch adds a simple test, that calls the uname syscall with a
> >>>>> tagged user pointer as an argument. Without the kernel accepting tagged
> >>>>> user pointers the test fails with EFAULT.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>
> >>>>> ---
> >>>>>  tools/testing/selftests/arm64/.gitignore      |  1 +
> >>>>>  tools/testing/selftests/arm64/Makefile        | 11 +++++++
> >>>>>  .../testing/selftests/arm64/run_tags_test.sh  | 12 ++++++++
> >>>>>  tools/testing/selftests/arm64/tags_test.c     | 29 +++++++++++++++++++
> >>>>>  4 files changed, 53 insertions(+)
> >>>>>  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/arm64/.gitignore
> >>>>>  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/arm64/Makefile
> >>>>>  create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/arm64/run_tags_test.sh
> >>>>>  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/arm64/tags_test.c
> >>>>
> >>>> After building a fresh Kernel from arm64/for-next-core from scratch at:
> >>>>
> >>>> commit 239ab658bea3b387424501e7c416640d6752dc0c
> >>>> Merge: 6bfa3134bd3a 42d038c4fb00 1243cb6a676f d55c5f28afaf d06fa5a118f1 34b5560db40d
> >>>> Author: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
> >>>> Date:   Thu Aug 22 18:23:53 2019 +0100
> >>>>
> >>>>     Merge branches 'for-next/error-injection', 'for-next/tbi', 'for-next/psci-cpuidle', 'for-next/cpu-topology' and 'for-next/52-bit-kva' into for-next/core
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> KSFT arm64 tests build is broken for me, both setting or not KBUILD_OUTPUT=
> >>>>
> >>>> 13:30 $ make TARGETS=arm64 kselftest-clean
> >>>> make[1]: Entering directory '/home/crimar01/ARM/dev/src/pdsw/out_linux'
> >>>> rm -f -r /home/crimar01/ARM/dev/src/pdsw/out_linux//kselftest/arm64/tags_test
> >>>> make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/crimar01/ARM/dev/src/pdsw/out_linux'
> >>>>
> >>>> ✔ ~/ARM/dev/src/pdsw/linux [arm64_for_next_core|…8⚑ 23]
> >>>>
> >>>> 13:30 $ make TARGETS=arm64 kselftest
> >>>> make[1]: Entering directory '/home/crimar01/ARM/dev/src/pdsw/out_linux'
> >>>> arch/arm64/Makefile:56: CROSS_COMPILE_COMPAT not defined or empty, the compat vDSO will not be built
> >>>> make --no-builtin-rules INSTALL_HDR_PATH=$BUILD/usr \
> >>>>         ARCH=arm64 -C ../../.. headers_install
> >>>>   HOSTCC  scripts/basic/fixdep
> >>>>   HOSTCC  scripts/unifdef
> >>>> ...
> >>>> ...
> >>>>   HDRINST usr/include/asm/msgbuf.h
> >>>>   HDRINST usr/include/asm/shmbuf.h
> >>>>   INSTALL /home/crimar01/ARM/dev/src/pdsw/out_linux//kselftest/usr/include
> >>>> /opt/toolchains/gcc-arm-8.3-2019.03-x86_64-aarch64-linux-gnu/bin/aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc     tags_test.c  -o /home/crimar01/ARM/dev/src/pdsw/out_linux//kselftest/arm64/tags_test
> >>>> tags_test.c: In function ‘main’:
> >>>> tags_test.c:21:12: error: ‘PR_SET_TAGGED_ADDR_CTRL’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘PR_GET_TID_ADDRESS’?
> >>>>   if (prctl(PR_SET_TAGGED_ADDR_CTRL, PR_TAGGED_ADDR_ENABLE, 0, 0, 0) == 0)
> >>>>             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >>>>             PR_GET_TID_ADDRESS
> >>>> tags_test.c:21:12: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
> >>>> tags_test.c:21:37: error: ‘PR_TAGGED_ADDR_ENABLE’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘PR_GET_DUMPABLE’?
> >>>>   if (prctl(PR_SET_TAGGED_ADDR_CTRL, PR_TAGGED_ADDR_ENABLE, 0, 0, 0) == 0)
> >>>>                                      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >>>>                                      PR_GET_DUMPABLE
> >>>> ../lib.mk:138: recipe for target '/home/crimar01/ARM/dev/src/pdsw/out_linux//kselftest/arm64/tags_test' failed
> >>>> make[3]: *** [/home/crimar01/ARM/dev/src/pdsw/out_linux//kselftest/arm64/tags_test] Error 1
> >>>> Makefile:136: recipe for target 'all' failed
> >>>> make[2]: *** [all] Error 2
> >>>> /home/crimar01/ARM/dev/src/pdsw/linux/Makefile:1237: recipe for target 'kselftest' failed
> >>>> make[1]: *** [kselftest] Error 2
> >>>> make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/crimar01/ARM/dev/src/pdsw/out_linux'
> >>>> Makefile:179: recipe for target 'sub-make' failed
> >>>> make: *** [sub-make] Error 2
> >>>>
> >>>> Despite seeing KSFT installing Kernel Headers, they cannot be found.
> >>>>
> >>>> Fixing this patch like this make it work for me:
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/Makefile
> >>>> index a61b2e743e99..f9f79fb272f0 100644
> >>>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/Makefile
> >>>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/Makefile
> >>>> @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
> >>>>  ARCH ?= $(shell uname -m 2>/dev/null || echo not)
> >>>>
> >>>>  ifneq (,$(filter $(ARCH),aarch64 arm64))
> >>>> +CFLAGS += -I../../../../usr/include/
> >>>>  TEST_GEN_PROGS := tags_test
> >>>>  TEST_PROGS := run_tags_test.sh
> >>>>  endif
> >>>>
> >>>> but is not really a proper fix since it does NOT account for case in which you have
> >>>> installed the Kernel Headers in a non standard location like when you use KBUILD_OUTPUT.
> >>>>
> >>>> Am I missing something ?
> >>>
> >>> Hm, PR_SET_TAGGED_ADDR_CTRL is defined in include/uapi/linux/prctl.h,
> >>> and the test has #include <sys/prctl.h> so as long as you've updated
> >>> your kernel headers this should work.
> >>>
> >>> (I'm OOO next week, I'll see if I can reproduce this once I'm back).
> >>
> >> Ok. Thanks for the reply.
> >>
> >> I think I've got it in my local tree having cloned arm64/for-next-core:
> >>
> >> 18:32 $ egrep -A 10 PR_SET_TAG ./include/uapi/linux/prctl.h
> >> #define PR_SET_TAGGED_ADDR_CTRL         55
> >> #define PR_GET_TAGGED_ADDR_CTRL         56
> >> # define PR_TAGGED_ADDR_ENABLE          (1UL << 0)
> >>
> >> #endif /* _LINUX_PRCTL_H */
> >>
> >> and Kernel header are locally installed in my kernel src dir (by KSFT indeed)
> >>
> >> 18:34 $ egrep -RA 10 PR_SET_TAG usr/include/
> >> usr/include/linux/prctl.h:#define PR_SET_TAGGED_ADDR_CTRL               55
> >> usr/include/linux/prctl.h-#define PR_GET_TAGGED_ADDR_CTRL               56
> >> usr/include/linux/prctl.h-# define PR_TAGGED_ADDR_ENABLE                (1UL << 0)
> >> usr/include/linux/prctl.h-
> >> usr/include/linux/prctl.h-#endif /* _LINUX_PRCTL_H */
> >>
> >> but how are they supposed to be found if nor the test Makefile
> >> neither the KSFT Makefile who installs them pass any -I options to the
> >> compiler ?
> >> I suppose <sys/prctl.h> tries to include arch specific headers from the regular system path,
> >> but when you are cross-compiling ?
> >>
> >> 18:34 $ make TARGETS=arm64 kselftest
> >> make[1]: Entering directory '/home/crimar01/ARM/dev/src/pdsw/out_linux'
> >> arch/arm64/Makefile:56: CROSS_COMPILE_COMPAT not defined or empty, the compat vDSO will not be built
> >> make --no-builtin-rules INSTALL_HDR_PATH=$BUILD/usr \
> >>         ARCH=arm64 -C ../../.. headers_install
> >>   INSTALL /home/crimar01/ARM/dev/src/pdsw/out_linux/kselftest/usr/include
> >> /opt/toolchains/gcc-arm-8.3-2019.03-x86_64-aarch64-linux-gnu/bin/aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc -Wall -O2 -g    tags_test.c  -o /home/crimar01/ARM/dev/src/pdsw/out_linux/kselftest/arm64/tags/tags_test
> >> tags_test.c: In function ‘main’:
> >> tags_test.c:20:12: error: ‘PR_SET_TAGGED_ADDR_CTRL’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘PR_GET_TID_ADDRESS’?
> >>   if (prctl(PR_SET_TAGGED_ADDR_CTRL, PR_TAGGED_ADDR_ENABLE, 0, 0, 0) == 0)
> >>             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >>             PR_GET_TID_ADDRESS
> >> tags_test.c:20:12: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
> >> tags_test.c:20:37: error: ‘PR_TAGGED_ADDR_ENABLE’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘PR_GET_DUMPABLE’?
> >>   if (prctl(PR_SET_TAGGED_ADDR_CTRL, PR_TAGGED_ADDR_ENABLE, 0, 0, 0) == 0)
> >>                                      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >>                                      PR_GET_DUMPABLE
> >> ../../lib.mk:138: recipe for target '/home/crimar01/ARM/dev/src/pdsw/out_linux/kselftest/arm64/tags/tags_test' failed
> >> make[4]: *** [/home/crimar01/ARM/dev/src/pdsw/out_linux/kselftest/arm64/tags/tags_test] Error 1
> >> Makefile:19: recipe for target 'all' failed
> >> make[3]: *** [all] Error 2
> >> Makefile:137: recipe for target 'all' failed
> >> make[2]: *** [all] Error 2
> >> /home/crimar01/ARM/dev/src/pdsw/linux/Makefile:1236: recipe for target 'kselftest' failed
> >> make[1]: *** [kselftest] Error 2
> >> make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/crimar01/ARM/dev/src/pdsw/out_linux'
> >> Makefile:179: recipe for target 'sub-make' failed
> >> make: *** [sub-make] Error 2
> >>
> >>
> >> In fact many KSFT testcases seems to brutally add default headers path:
> >>
> >> tools/testing/selftests/memfd/Makefile:CFLAGS += -I../../../../include/uapi/
> >> tools/testing/selftests/memfd/Makefile:CFLAGS += -I../../../../include/
> >> tools/testing/selftests/memfd/Makefile:CFLAGS += -I../../../../usr/include/
> >> tools/testing/selftests/net/Makefile:CFLAGS += -I../../../../usr/include/
> >> tools/testing/selftests/membarrier/Makefile:CFLAGS += -g -I../../../../usr/include/
> >> ...
> >
> > Hi Cristian!
> >
> > Indeed, I can reproduce the issue. I don't know what's the proper way
> > to resolve this. Adding "CFLAGS += -I../../../../usr/include/" looks
> > good to me. AFAICS your series resolves this issue in a similar way,
> > but I think we should fix this before the current rc is released. Do
> > you want to submit a patch that adds this simple fix or should I do
> > that?
> >
>
> Please feel free to post the single line patch above to quickly fix this before
> release, so we don't have a broken build straight away. (our CI is already beating me...:D)

Done.

>
> On my side (01/11) in the meantime I'll fix the top level KSFT arm64 makefile so as to calculate
> and propagate once for all the headers search path down to all KSFT arm64/ in one go,
> trying to guess where they are; this is needed because the above fix works fine as long
> as you don't have KBUILD_OUTPUT set, once you set it, KSFT installs kheaders in a different
> place and the  above -I fix is fooled again....but this is a general problem also in other
> KSFT tests as I can see now so I think this fix is good enough for now
> (and the fix on my side, even if trivial, is not going to go into this release for sure)

Ah, I see.

Thanks for the report!

>
> Thanks !
>
> Cheers
>
> Cristian
>
> > Thanks!
> >
> >>
> >> Cheers
> >>
> >> Cristian
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks
> >>>>
> >>>> Cristian
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/.gitignore b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/.gitignore
> >>>>> new file mode 100644
> >>>>> index 000000000000..e8fae8d61ed6
> >>>>> --- /dev/null
> >>>>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/.gitignore
> >>>>> @@ -0,0 +1 @@
> >>>>> +tags_test
> >>>>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/Makefile
> >>>>> new file mode 100644
> >>>>> index 000000000000..a61b2e743e99
> >>>>> --- /dev/null
> >>>>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/Makefile
> >>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
> >>>>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +# ARCH can be overridden by the user for cross compiling
> >>>>> +ARCH ?= $(shell uname -m 2>/dev/null || echo not)
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +ifneq (,$(filter $(ARCH),aarch64 arm64))
> >>>>> +TEST_GEN_PROGS := tags_test
> >>>>> +TEST_PROGS := run_tags_test.sh
> >>>>> +endif
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +include ../lib.mk
> >>>>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/run_tags_test.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/run_tags_test.sh
> >>>>> new file mode 100755
> >>>>> index 000000000000..745f11379930
> >>>>> --- /dev/null
> >>>>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/run_tags_test.sh
> >>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
> >>>>> +#!/bin/sh
> >>>>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +echo "--------------------"
> >>>>> +echo "running tags test"
> >>>>> +echo "--------------------"
> >>>>> +./tags_test
> >>>>> +if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then
> >>>>> +     echo "[FAIL]"
> >>>>> +else
> >>>>> +     echo "[PASS]"
> >>>>> +fi
> >>>>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/tags_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/tags_test.c
> >>>>> new file mode 100644
> >>>>> index 000000000000..22a1b266e373
> >>>>> --- /dev/null
> >>>>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/tags_test.c
> >>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
> >>>>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +#include <stdio.h>
> >>>>> +#include <stdlib.h>
> >>>>> +#include <unistd.h>
> >>>>> +#include <stdint.h>
> >>>>> +#include <sys/prctl.h>
> >>>>> +#include <sys/utsname.h>
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +#define SHIFT_TAG(tag)               ((uint64_t)(tag) << 56)
> >>>>> +#define SET_TAG(ptr, tag)    (((uint64_t)(ptr) & ~SHIFT_TAG(0xff)) | \
> >>>>> +                                     SHIFT_TAG(tag))
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +int main(void)
> >>>>> +{
> >>>>> +     static int tbi_enabled = 0;
> >>>>> +     struct utsname *ptr, *tagged_ptr;
> >>>>> +     int err;
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +     if (prctl(PR_SET_TAGGED_ADDR_CTRL, PR_TAGGED_ADDR_ENABLE, 0, 0, 0) == 0)
> >>>>> +             tbi_enabled = 1;
> >>>>> +     ptr = (struct utsname *)malloc(sizeof(*ptr));
> >>>>> +     if (tbi_enabled)
> >>>>> +             tagged_ptr = (struct utsname *)SET_TAG(ptr, 0x42);
> >>>>> +     err = uname(tagged_ptr);
> >>>>> +     free(ptr);
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +     return err;
> >>>>> +}
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists