[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190904175307.488673549@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2019 19:53:54 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org,
"Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Steven Rostedt (VMware)" <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.19 52/93] ftrace: Check for successful allocation of hash
From: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
commit 5b0022dd32b7c2e15edf1827ba80aa1407edf9ff upstream.
In register_ftrace_function_probe(), we are not checking the return
value of alloc_and_copy_ftrace_hash(). The subsequent call to
ftrace_match_records() may end up dereferencing the same. Add a check to
ensure this doesn't happen.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/26e92574f25ad23e7cafa3cf5f7a819de1832cbe.1562249521.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Fixes: 1ec3a81a0cf42 ("ftrace: Have each function probe use its own ftrace_ops")
Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
kernel/trace/ftrace.c | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
--- a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
@@ -4317,6 +4317,11 @@ register_ftrace_function_probe(char *glo
old_hash = *orig_hash;
hash = alloc_and_copy_ftrace_hash(FTRACE_HASH_DEFAULT_BITS, old_hash);
+ if (!hash) {
+ ret = -ENOMEM;
+ goto out;
+ }
+
ret = ftrace_match_records(hash, glob, strlen(glob));
/* Nothing found? */
Powered by blists - more mailing lists