[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9b924e48-e217-9c11-c1fb-46c92a82ea2d@acm.org>
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2019 12:47:13 -0700
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>,
Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.com>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
Long Li <longli@...rosoft.com>,
John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] softirq: implement IRQ flood detection mechanism
On 9/4/19 11:02 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 04, 2019 at 10:38:59AM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>> I think it is widely known that rdtsc is a relatively slow x86 instruction.
>> So I expect that using that instruction will cause a measurable overhead if
>> it is called frequently enough. I'm not aware of any publicly available
>> measurement data however.
>
> https://www.agner.org/optimize/instruction_tables.pdf
>
> RDTSC, Ryzen: ~36
> RDTSC, Skylake: ~20
>
> Sadly those same tables don't list the cost of actual exceptions or even
> IRET :/
Thanks Peter for having looked up these numbers. These numbers are much
better than last time I checked. Ming, would CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING
help your workload?
Does anyone know which CPUs the following text from
Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt refers to?
tsc= [ ... ]
[x86] noirqtime: Do not use TSC to do irq accounting.
Used to run time disable IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING on any
platforms where RDTSC is slow and this accounting
can add overhead.
Bart.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists