[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPaKu7RWiEr5n_DWcg0H2PPnRs9CUn-ZgQV3NYe8VrdZgEAhTQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2019 16:10:30 -0700
From: Chia-I Wu <olvaffe@...il.com>
To: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>
Cc: ML dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
"open list:VIRTIO GPU DRIVER"
<virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/virtio: fix command submission with objects but
without fence.
On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 12:48 AM Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> Only call virtio_gpu_array_add_fence if we actually have a fence.
>
> Fixes: da758d51968a ("drm/virtio: rework virtio_gpu_execbuffer_ioctl fencing")
> Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_vq.c | 9 +++++----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_vq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_vq.c
> index 595fa6ec2d58..7fd2851f7b97 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_vq.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_vq.c
> @@ -339,11 +339,12 @@ static void virtio_gpu_queue_fenced_ctrl_buffer(struct virtio_gpu_device *vgdev,
> goto again;
> }
>
> - if (fence)
> + if (fence) {
> virtio_gpu_fence_emit(vgdev, hdr, fence);
> - if (vbuf->objs) {
> - virtio_gpu_array_add_fence(vbuf->objs, &fence->f);
> - virtio_gpu_array_unlock_resv(vbuf->objs);
> + if (vbuf->objs) {
> + virtio_gpu_array_add_fence(vbuf->objs, &fence->f);
> + virtio_gpu_array_unlock_resv(vbuf->objs);
> + }
This leaks when fence == NULL and vbuf->objs != NULL (which can really
happen IIRC... not at my desk to check).
> }
> notify = virtio_gpu_queue_ctrl_buffer_locked(vgdev, vbuf);
> spin_unlock(&vgdev->ctrlq.qlock);
> --
> 2.18.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists