[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bbdb613c-020b-03ec-c218-57299c3f6b29@windriver.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2019 16:39:49 +0800
From: "Hongzhi, Song" <hongzhi.song@...driver.com>
To: <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@...e.com>
CC: <josef@...icpanda.com>
Subject: Re: Bug?: unlink cause btrfs error but other fs don't
Hi Nikolay,
>
There were multiple fixes from Josef recently improving btrfs enospc
handling with tiny filesystems (which is generally not the targeted use
case of btrfs). The code lives in
https://github.com/kdave/btrfs-devel/commits/misc-next should you want
to test it. Otherwise re-test after next merge windows when those
patches are supposed to be merged for 5.4
>
Thank for your reply, I will keep eyes on the branch.
ps: this email is my simply testcase from ltp
--Hongzhi
On 9/4/19 4:02 PM, Hongzhi, Song wrote:
> Hi ,
>
>
> *Kernel:*
>
> After v5.2-rc1, qemux86-64
>
> make -j40 ARCH=x86_64 CROSS_COMPILE=x86-64-gcc
> use qemu to bootup kernel
>
>
> *Reproduce:*
>
> There is a test case failed on btrfs but success on other
> fs(ext4,ext3), see attachment.
>
>
> Download attachments:
>
> gcc test.c -o myout -Wall -lpthread
>
> copy myout and run.sh to your qemu same directory.
>
> on qemu:
>
> ./run.sh
>
>
> I found the block device size with btrfs set 512M will cause the
> error.
> 256M and 1G all success.
>
>
> *Error info:*
>
> "BTRFS warning (device loop0): could not allocate space for a
> delete; will truncate on mount"
>
>
> *Related patch:*
>
> I use git bisect to find the following patch introduces the issue.
>
> commit c8eaeac7b734347c3afba7008b7af62f37b9c140
> Author: Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>
> Date: Wed Apr 10 15:56:10 2019 -0400
>
> btrfs: reserve delalloc metadata differently
> ...
>
>
> Anyone's reply will be appreciated.
>
> --Hongzhi
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists