linux-kernel - [PATCH v2 2/2] KVM: selftests: Test invalid bits in kvm_valid_regs and kvm_dirty

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190904085200.29021-3-thuth@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed,  4 Sep 2019 10:52:00 +0200
From:   Thomas Huth <thuth@...hat.com>
To:     kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
        Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc:     David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] KVM: selftests: Test invalid bits in kvm_valid_regs and kvm_dirty_regs on s390x

Now that we disallow invalid bits in kvm_valid_regs and kvm_dirty_regs
on s390x, too, we should also check this condition in the selftests.
The code has been taken from the x86-version of the sync_regs_test.

Reviewed-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@...hat.com>
---
 .../selftests/kvm/s390x/sync_regs_test.c      | 30 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/sync_regs_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/sync_regs_test.c
index bbc93094519b..d5290b4ad636 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/sync_regs_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/sync_regs_test.c
@@ -85,6 +85,36 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
 
 	run = vcpu_state(vm, VCPU_ID);
 
+	/* Request reading invalid register set from VCPU. */
+	run->kvm_valid_regs = INVALID_SYNC_FIELD;
+	rv = _vcpu_run(vm, VCPU_ID);
+	TEST_ASSERT(rv < 0 && errno == EINVAL,
+		    "Invalid kvm_valid_regs did not cause expected KVM_RUN error: %d\n",
+		    rv);
+	vcpu_state(vm, VCPU_ID)->kvm_valid_regs = 0;
+
+	run->kvm_valid_regs = INVALID_SYNC_FIELD | TEST_SYNC_FIELDS;
+	rv = _vcpu_run(vm, VCPU_ID);
+	TEST_ASSERT(rv < 0 && errno == EINVAL,
+		    "Invalid kvm_valid_regs did not cause expected KVM_RUN error: %d\n",
+		    rv);
+	vcpu_state(vm, VCPU_ID)->kvm_valid_regs = 0;
+
+	/* Request setting invalid register set into VCPU. */
+	run->kvm_dirty_regs = INVALID_SYNC_FIELD;
+	rv = _vcpu_run(vm, VCPU_ID);
+	TEST_ASSERT(rv < 0 && errno == EINVAL,
+		    "Invalid kvm_dirty_regs did not cause expected KVM_RUN error: %d\n",
+		    rv);
+	vcpu_state(vm, VCPU_ID)->kvm_dirty_regs = 0;
+
+	run->kvm_dirty_regs = INVALID_SYNC_FIELD | TEST_SYNC_FIELDS;
+	rv = _vcpu_run(vm, VCPU_ID);
+	TEST_ASSERT(rv < 0 && errno == EINVAL,
+		    "Invalid kvm_dirty_regs did not cause expected KVM_RUN error: %d\n",
+		    rv);
+	vcpu_state(vm, VCPU_ID)->kvm_dirty_regs = 0;
+
 	/* Request and verify all valid register sets. */
 	run->kvm_valid_regs = TEST_SYNC_FIELDS;
 	rv = _vcpu_run(vm, VCPU_ID);
-- 
2.18.1