[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <4AB1ABA7-B659-41B7-8364-132AD3608FA6@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2019 21:23:34 -0600
From: William Kucharski <william.kucharski@...cle.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>,
Bob Kasten <robert.a.kasten@...el.com>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
Chad Mynhier <chad.mynhier@...cle.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Johannes Weiner <jweiner@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] mm,thp: Add experimental config option
RO_EXEC_FILEMAP_HUGE_FAULT_THP
> On Sep 3, 2019, at 1:15 PM, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> Then I would suggest mentioning all this in the changelog so that the
> overall intention is clear. It is also up to you fs developers to find a
> consensus on how to move forward. I have brought that up mostly because
> I really hate seeing new config options added due to shortage of
> confidence in the code. That really smells like working around standard
> code quality inclusion process.
I do mention a good deal of this in the blurb in part [0/2] of the patch,
though I don't cover the readpage/readpages() debate. Ideally readpage()
should do just that, read a page, based on the size of the page passed,
and not assume "page" means "PAGESIZE."
I can also make the "help" text for the option more descriptive if
desired.
Thanks for your comments!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists