lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 4 Sep 2019 21:38:36 +0800
From:   "Ramuthevar, Vadivel MuruganX" 
        <vadivel.muruganx.ramuthevar@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>
Cc:     kishon@...com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, robh@...nel.org,
        cheol.yong.kim@...el.com, qi-ming.wu@...el.com,
        peter.harliman.liem@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] phy: intel-lgm-sdxc: Add support for SDXC PHY

Hi Andy,

  Thank you for the review comments .

On 4/9/2019 8:39 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 04, 2019 at 02:27:19PM +0800, Ramuthevar,Vadivel MuruganX wrote:
>> From: Ramuthevar Vadivel Murugan <vadivel.muruganx.ramuthevar@...ux.intel.com>
>>
>> Add support for SDXC PHY on Intel's Lightning Mountain SoC.
> What's the difference to eMMC PHY?
> Can they share the same / similar code?
eMMC and SDXC interface controller share the common driver since IP block
of the vendor(SDHC-ARASAN) is same, where as PHY is different. The PHY 
is designed by Intel itself to support
specific eMMC card and SD/SDIO card specific. e.g: PAD, CLK, driver 
strength..etc.

IP block of the PHY  is different module for eMMC and SDXC to adapt the 
controllers, that is reason we have different drivers.
---
With Best Regards
Vadivel

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ