lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <4BACAECC-C4CF-4EB7-8626-E628934DAE32@holtmann.org>
Date:   Wed, 4 Sep 2019 16:01:26 +0200
From:   Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>
To:     Max Chou <max.chou@...ltek.com>
Cc:     Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@...il.com>,
        linux-bluetooth <linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, alex_lu@...lsil.com.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Bluetooth: btrtl: Fix an issue that failing to download
 the FW which size is over 32K bytes

Hi Max,

> Fix the issue that when the FW size is 32K+, it will fail for the download
> process because of the incorrect index.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Max Chou <max.chou@...ltek.com>
> ---
> drivers/bluetooth/btrtl.c | 8 +++++++-
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/btrtl.c b/drivers/bluetooth/btrtl.c
> index 0354e93e7a7c..215896af0259 100644
> --- a/drivers/bluetooth/btrtl.c
> +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/btrtl.c
> @@ -389,6 +389,7 @@ static int rtl_download_firmware(struct hci_dev *hdev,
> 	int frag_len = RTL_FRAG_LEN;
> 	int ret = 0;
> 	int i;
> +	int j;
> 	struct sk_buff *skb;
> 	struct hci_rp_read_local_version *rp;
> 
> @@ -401,7 +402,12 @@ static int rtl_download_firmware(struct hci_dev *hdev,
> 
> 		BT_DBG("download fw (%d/%d)", i, frag_num);
> 
> -		dl_cmd->index = i;
> +		if (i > 0x7f)
> +			j = (i & 0x7f) + 1;
> +		else
> +			j = i;
> +
> +		dl_cmd->index = j;

so this seems rather complicated with the extra variable.

		if (i > 0x7f)
			dl_cmd->index = (i & 0x7f) + 1;
		else
			dl_cmd->index = i;

And I would prefer to have a small comment above on why this is done this way.

Regards

Marcel

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ