linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] net: stmmac: Add support for MDIO interrupts

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190904145804.GA9068@lunn.ch>
Date:   Wed, 4 Sep 2019 16:58:04 +0200
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Voon Weifeng <weifeng.voon@...el.com>
Cc:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>,
        Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
        Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
        Ong Boon Leong <boon.leong.ong@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] net: stmmac: Add support for MDIO interrupts

On Wed, Sep 04, 2019 at 10:02:54PM +0800, Voon Weifeng wrote:
> From: "Chuah, Kim Tatt" <kim.tatt.chuah@...el.com>
> 
> DW EQoS v5.xx controllers added capability for interrupt generation
> when MDIO interface is done (GMII Busy bit is cleared).
> This patch adds support for this interrupt on supported HW to avoid
> polling on GMII Busy bit.
> 
> stmmac_mdio_read() & stmmac_mdio_write() will sleep until wake_up() is
> called by the interrupt handler.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Voon Weifeng <weifeng.voon@...el.com>
> Reviewed-by: Kweh, Hock Leong <hock.leong.kweh@...el.com>
> Reviewed-by: Ong Boon Leong <boon.leong.ong@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chuah, Kim Tatt <kim.tatt.chuah@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ong Boon Leong <boon.leong.ong@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Voon Weifeng <weifeng.voon@...el.com>

Hi Voon

It is normal to include a short description of what you changed
between the previous version and this version.

The formatting of this patch also looks a bit odd. Did you use 
git format-patch ; git send-email?

Thanks
	Andrew