linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/6] Address issues with SPDX requirements and PEP-263

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 05 Sep 2019 13:05:08 -0700
From:   Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:     Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>,
        Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...radead.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        Sven Eckelmann <sven@...fation.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Doug Smythies <doug.smythies@...il.com>,
        Aurélien Cedeyn <aurelien.cedeyn@...il.com>,
        Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>,
        Armijn Hemel <armijn@...ldur.nl>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
        Uwe Kleine-König 
        <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@...a.pv.it>,
        Allison Randal <allison@...utok.net>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Address issues with SPDX requirements and PEP-263

On Thu, 2019-09-05 at 16:57 -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> The  description at Documentation/process/license-rules.rst is very strict
> with regards to the position where the SPDX tags should be.
[]
> PS.: I sent already a RFC version for those patches along with this
> thread:
> 
>     https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/b32c2e46b91e7bcda2a9bd140673f06d71b2487a.camel@perches.com/

Nice, thanks.

Now I guess I have to update checkpatch too.
(unless you want to... ;)