linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 02/11] mmc: dw_mmc: Re-store SDIO IRQs mask at system resume

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAD=FV=XaaC=RpCiF09WAuhmDgte3EmFjFxk9y7xpX=HBwaRr9g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 5 Sep 2019 16:47:05 -0700
From:   Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To:     Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Cc:     Linux MMC List <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>,
        Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@...k-chips.com>,
        Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@...sung.com>,
        Yong Mao <yong.mao@...iatek.com>,
        Chaotian Jing <chaotian.jing@...iatek.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/11] mmc: dw_mmc: Re-store SDIO IRQs mask at system resume

Hi,

On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 7:22 AM Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> In cases when SDIO IRQs have been enabled, runtime suspend is prevented by
> the driver. However, this still means dw_mci_runtime_suspend|resume() gets
> called during system suspend/resume, via pm_runtime_force_suspend|resume().
> This means during system suspend/resume, the register context of the dw_mmc
> device most likely loses its register context, even in cases when SDIO IRQs
> have been enabled.

Even if they weren't lost the resume code currently has this statement:

mci_writel(host, INTMASK, SDMMC_INT_CMD_DONE | SDMMC_INT_DATA_OVER |
   SDMMC_INT_TXDR | SDMMC_INT_RXDR |
   DW_MCI_ERROR_FLAGS);

...so that would have clobbered any existing state even if register
state wasn't lost.  ;-)

> To re-enable the SDIO IRQs during system resume, the dw_mmc driver
> currently relies on the mmc core to re-enable the SDIO IRQs when it resumes
> the SDIO card, but this isn't the recommended solution. Instead, it's
> better to deal with this locally in the dw_mmc driver, so let's do that.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
> index eea52e2c5a0c..f114710e82b4 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
> @@ -3460,6 +3460,10 @@ int dw_mci_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
>         /* Force setup bus to guarantee available clock output */
>         dw_mci_setup_bus(host->slot, true);
>
> +       /* Re-enable SDIO interrupts. */
> +       if (sdio_irq_enabled(host->slot->mmc))
> +               __dw_mci_enable_sdio_irq(host->slot, 1);
> +

There's a slight bit of subtleness here and I guess we need to figure
out if it matters.  From testing things seem to work OK so maybe we're
fine, but just to explain what's bugging me:

If we got an SDIO interrupt that was never ACKed then this is going to
act like an implicit ACK.  Notice that dw_mci_ack_sdio_irq() is
exactly this call because when the SDIO IRQ fires we mask it out.
...then unmask when Acked.

Specifically after your series is applied, I think this is what
happens if an interrupt fires while the SDIO bus is officially
suspended:

1. dw_mci_interrupt() will get called which will mask the SDIO IRQ and
then call sdio_signal_irq()

2. sdio_signal_irq() will queue some delayed work.

3. The work will call sdio_run_irqs()

4. sdio_run_irqs() _won't_ ack the IRQ, so it will stay disabled.

5. When we get to the resume we'll re-enable the interrupt.

I guess that's fine, but it is a little weird that we might not really
be restoring it simply because it got disabled due to the clobbering
of INTMASK but also because we implicitly skipped Acking an interrupt
that fired.

I wonder if the correct fix is to just add an explit zeroing of the
INTMASK (so mask all interrupts) in dw_mmc's suspend callback.  Then
there's no possible way we could get an interrupt during suspend...

-Doug