| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20190905065917.GE5541@shbuild999.sh.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2019 14:59:17 +0800
From: Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Rong Chen <rong.a.chen@...el.com>,
Michel Dänzer <michel@...nzer.net>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>, LKP <lkp@...org>
Subject: Re: [LKP] [drm/mgag200] 90f479ae51: vm-scalability.median -18.8%
regression
Hi Vetter,
On Wed, Sep 04, 2019 at 01:20:29PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 1:15 PM Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 4 Sep 2019 at 19:17, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 10:35 AM Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Daniel,
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Sep 04, 2019 at 10:11:11AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 8:53 AM Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Am 04.09.19 um 08:27 schrieb Feng Tang:
> > > > > > >> Thank you for testing. But don't get too excited, because the patch
> > > > > > >> simulates a bug that was present in the original mgag200 code. A
> > > > > > >> significant number of frames are simply skipped. That is apparently the
> > > > > > >> reason why it's faster.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks for the detailed info, so the original code skips time-consuming
> > > > > > > work inside atomic context on purpose. Is there any space to optmise it?
> > > > > > > If 2 scheduled update worker are handled at almost same time, can one be
> > > > > > > skipped?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > To my knowledge, there's only one instance of the worker. Re-scheduling
> > > > > > the worker before a previous instance started, will not create a second
> > > > > > instance. The worker's instance will complete all pending updates. So in
> > > > > > some way, skipping workers already happens.
> > > > >
> > > > > So I think that the most often fbcon update from atomic context is the
> > > > > blinking cursor. If you disable that one you should be back to the old
> > > > > performance level I think, since just writing to dmesg is from process
> > > > > context, so shouldn't change.
> > > >
> > > > Hmm, then for the old driver, it should also do the most update in
> > > > non-atomic context?
> > > >
> > > > One other thing is, I profiled that updating a 3MB shadow buffer needs
> > > > 20 ms, which transfer to 150 MB/s bandwidth. Could it be related with
> > > > the cache setting of DRM shadow buffer? say the orginal code use a
> > > > cachable buffer?
> > >
> > > Hm, that would indicate the write-combining got broken somewhere. This
> > > should definitely be faster. Also we shouldn't transfer the hole
> > > thing, except when scrolling ...
> >
> > First rule of fbcon usage, you are always effectively scrolling.
> >
> > Also these devices might be on a PCIE 1x piece of wet string, not sure
> > if the numbers reflect that.
>
> pcie 1x 1.0 is 250MB/s, so yeah with a bit of inefficiency and
> overhead not entirely out of the question that 150MB/s is actually the
> hw limit. If it's really pcie 1x 1.0, no idea where to check that.
> Also might be worth to double-check that the gpu pci bar is listed as
> wc in debugfs/x86/pat_memtype_list.
Here is some dump of the device info and the pat_memtype_list, while it is
running other 0day task:
controller info
=================
03:00.0 VGA compatible controller: Matrox Electronics Systems Ltd. MGA G200e [Pilot] ServerEngines (SEP1) (rev 05) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
Subsystem: Intel Corporation MGA G200e [Pilot] ServerEngines (SEP1)
Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster- SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx-
Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx-
Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 16
NUMA node: 0
Region 0: Memory at d0000000 (32-bit, prefetchable) [size=16M]
Region 1: Memory at d1800000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=16K]
Region 2: Memory at d1000000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=8M]
Expansion ROM at 000c0000 [disabled] [size=128K]
Capabilities: [dc] Power Management version 2
Flags: PMEClk- DSI+ D1- D2- AuxCurrent=0mA PME(D0-,D1-,D2-,D3hot-,D3cold-)
Status: D0 NoSoftRst- PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME-
Capabilities: [e4] Express (v1) Legacy Endpoint, MSI 00
DevCap: MaxPayload 256 bytes, PhantFunc 0, Latency L0s <64ns, L1 <1us
ExtTag- AttnBtn- AttnInd- PwrInd- RBE- FLReset-
DevCtl: Report errors: Correctable- Non-Fatal- Fatal- Unsupported-
RlxdOrd+ ExtTag- PhantFunc- AuxPwr- NoSnoop-
MaxPayload 128 bytes, MaxReadReq 128 bytes
DevSta: CorrErr+ UncorrErr+ FatalErr- UnsuppReq+ AuxPwr- TransPend-
LnkCap: Port #0, Speed 2.5GT/s, Width x1, ASPM L0s, Exit Latency L0s <64ns, L1 <1us
ClockPM- Surprise- LLActRep- BwNot- ASPMOptComp-
LnkCtl: ASPM Disabled; RCB 64 bytes Disabled- CommClk+
ExtSynch- ClockPM- AutWidDis- BWInt- AutBWInt-
LnkSta: Speed 2.5GT/s, Width x1, TrErr- Train- SlotClk+ DLActive- BWMgmt- ABWMgmt-
Capabilities: [54] MSI: Enable- Count=1/1 Maskable- 64bit-
Address: 00000000 Data: 0000
Kernel driver in use: mgag200
Kernel modules: mgag200
Related pat setting
===================
uncached-minus @ 0xc0000000-0xc0001000
uncached-minus @ 0xc0000000-0xd0000000
uncached-minus @ 0xc0008000-0xc0009000
uncached-minus @ 0xc0009000-0xc000a000
uncached-minus @ 0xc0010000-0xc0011000
uncached-minus @ 0xc0011000-0xc0012000
uncached-minus @ 0xc0012000-0xc0013000
uncached-minus @ 0xc0013000-0xc0014000
uncached-minus @ 0xc0018000-0xc0019000
uncached-minus @ 0xc0019000-0xc001a000
uncached-minus @ 0xc001a000-0xc001b000
write-combining @ 0xd0000000-0xd0300000
write-combining @ 0xd0000000-0xd1000000
uncached-minus @ 0xd1800000-0xd1804000
uncached-minus @ 0xd1900000-0xd1980000
uncached-minus @ 0xd1980000-0xd1981000
uncached-minus @ 0xd1a00000-0xd1a80000
uncached-minus @ 0xd1a80000-0xd1a81000
uncached-minus @ 0xd1f10000-0xd1f11000
uncached-minus @ 0xd1f11000-0xd1f12000
uncached-minus @ 0xd1f12000-0xd1f13000
Host bridge info
================
00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation Device 7853
Subsystem: Intel Corporation Device 0000
Control: I/O- Mem- BusMaster- SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx+
Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort+ <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx-
Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 0
NUMA node: 0
Capabilities: [90] Express (v2) Root Port (Slot-), MSI 00
DevCap: MaxPayload 128 bytes, PhantFunc 0
ExtTag- RBE+
DevCtl: Report errors: Correctable- Non-Fatal- Fatal- Unsupported-
RlxdOrd- ExtTag- PhantFunc- AuxPwr- NoSnoop-
MaxPayload 128 bytes, MaxReadReq 128 bytes
DevSta: CorrErr- UncorrErr- FatalErr- UnsuppReq- AuxPwr- TransPend-
LnkCap: Port #0, Speed 2.5GT/s, Width x4, ASPM L1, Exit Latency L0s <512ns, L1 <4us
ClockPM- Surprise+ LLActRep+ BwNot+ ASPMOptComp+
LnkCtl: ASPM Disabled; RCB 64 bytes Disabled- CommClk-
ExtSynch- ClockPM- AutWidDis- BWInt- AutBWInt-
LnkSta: Speed unknown, Width x0, TrErr- Train- SlotClk- DLActive- BWMgmt- ABWMgmt-
RootCtl: ErrCorrectable+ ErrNon-Fatal+ ErrFatal+ PMEIntEna- CRSVisible-
RootCap: CRSVisible-
RootSta: PME ReqID 0000, PMEStatus- PMEPending-
DevCap2: Completion Timeout: Range BCD, TimeoutDis+, LTR-, OBFF Not Supported ARIFwd-
DevCtl2: Completion Timeout: 50us to 50ms, TimeoutDis-, LTR-, OBFF Disabled ARIFwd-
LnkCtl2: Target Link Speed: 2.5GT/s, EnterCompliance- SpeedDis-
Transmit Margin: Normal Operating Range, EnterModifiedCompliance- ComplianceSOS-
Compliance De-emphasis: -6dB
LnkSta2: Current De-emphasis Level: -6dB, EqualizationComplete-, EqualizationPhase1-
EqualizationPhase2-, EqualizationPhase3-, LinkEqualizationRequest-
Capabilities: [e0] Power Management version 3
Flags: PMEClk- DSI- D1- D2- AuxCurrent=0mA PME(D0-,D1-,D2-,D3hot-,D3cold-)
Status: D0 NoSoftRst+ PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME-
Capabilities: [100 v1] Vendor Specific Information: ID=0002 Rev=0 Len=00c <?>
Capabilities: [144 v1] Vendor Specific Information: ID=0004 Rev=1 Len=03c <?>
Capabilities: [1d0 v1] Vendor Specific Information: ID=0003 Rev=1 Len=00a <?>
Capabilities: [250 v1] #19
Capabilities: [280 v1] Vendor Specific Information: ID=0005 Rev=3 Len=018 <?>
Capabilities: [298 v1] Vendor Specific Information: ID=0007 Rev=0 Len=024 <?>
Thanks,
Feng
>
> -Daniel
> --
> Daniel Vetter
> Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
Powered by blists - more mailing lists