linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] misc: fastrpc: free dma buf scatter list

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 5 Sep 2019 09:15:40 +0100
From:   Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
To:     Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Cc:     arnd@...db.de, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Mayank Chopra <mak.chopra@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] misc: fastrpc: free dma buf scatter list



On 05/09/2019 06:11, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Srinivas Kandagatla (2019-08-29 02:29:26)
>> diff --git a/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c b/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c
>> index eee2bb398947..47ae84afac2e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/misc/fastrpc.c
>> @@ -550,6 +550,7 @@ static void fastrpc_dma_buf_detatch(struct dma_buf *dmabuf,
> 
> Is the function really called buf_detatch? Is it supposed to be
> buf_detach?

Thanks Stephen, for you keen observation on the spelling, I will send a 
patch to fix that!

Looks like I inherited that from drivers/staging/android/ion/ion.c

--srini

> 
>>          mutex_lock(&buffer->lock);
>>          list_del(&a->node);
>>          mutex_unlock(&buffer->lock);
>> +       sg_free_table(&a->sgt);
>>          kfree(a);