lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87lfv32gfm.fsf@arm.com>
Date:   Thu, 05 Sep 2019 11:19:57 +0100
From:   Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@....com>
To:     subhra mazumdar <subhra.mazumdar@...cle.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
        mingo@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de, steven.sistare@...cle.com,
        dhaval.giani@...cle.com, daniel.lezcano@...aro.org,
        vincent.guittot@...aro.org, viresh.kumar@...aro.org,
        tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com, mgorman@...hsingularity.net,
        parth@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 4/9] sched: SIS_CORE to disable idle core search


On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 18:49:39 +0100, subhra mazumdar wrote...

> Use SIS_CORE to disable idle core search. For some workloads
> select_idle_core becomes a scalability bottleneck, removing it improves
> throughput. Also there are workloads where disabling it can hurt latency,
> so need to have an option.
>
> Signed-off-by: subhra mazumdar <subhra.mazumdar@...cle.com>
> ---
>  kernel/sched/fair.c | 8 +++++---
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index c31082d..23ec9c6 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -6268,9 +6268,11 @@ static int select_idle_sibling(struct task_struct *p, int prev, int target)
>  	if (!sd)
>  		return target;
>  
> -	i = select_idle_core(p, sd, target);
> -	if ((unsigned)i < nr_cpumask_bits)
> -		return i;
> +	if (sched_feat(SIS_CORE)) {
> +		i = select_idle_core(p, sd, target);
> +		if ((unsigned)i < nr_cpumask_bits)
> +			return i;
> +	}
>  
>  	i = select_idle_cpu(p, sd, target);
>  	if ((unsigned)i < nr_cpumask_bits)

This looks like should be squashed with the previous one, or whatever
code you'll add to define when this "biasing" is to be used or not.

Best,
Patrick

-- 
#include <best/regards.h>

Patrick Bellasi

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ