linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] riscv: dts: sifive: Add missing "clock-frequency" to cpu0/cpu1 nodes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 5 Sep 2019 20:01:41 +0800
From:   Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@...il.com>
To:     Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>
Cc:     Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...ive.com>,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-riscv <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] riscv: dts: sifive: Add missing "clock-frequency" to
 cpu0/cpu1 nodes

On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 11:00 PM Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 6 Aug 2019, Bin Meng wrote:
>
> > Add the missing "clock-frequency" property to the cpu0/cpu1 nodes
> > for consistency with other cpu nodes.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@...il.com>
>
> Is this being driven by a schema validator warning?  If not, and this
> property isn't required, it seems better just to drop it.  It seems
> useless?
>

Yes, I think we can drop it. I will send v2.

Regards,
Bin