[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1567686367.5576.89.camel@lca.pw>
Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2019 08:26:07 -0400
From: Qian Cai <cai@....pw>
To: tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: bhe@...hat.com, x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/kaslr: simplify the code in mem_avoid_memmap()
Ping. Please take a look at this trivial patch.
On Thu, 2019-08-22 at 10:26 -0400, Qian Cai wrote:
> If "i >= MAX_MEMMAP_REGIONS" already when entering mem_avoid_memmap(),
> even without the return statement the loop will not run anyway. The only
> time it needs to set "memmap_too_large = true" in this situation is
> "memmap_too_large" is "false" currently. Hence, the code could be
> simplified.
>
> Signed-off-by: Qian Cai <cai@....pw>
> ---
> arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c | 5 +----
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c
> b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c
> index 2e53c056ba20..35c6942fb95b 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c
> @@ -176,9 +176,6 @@ static void mem_avoid_memmap(char *str)
> {
> static int i;
>
> - if (i >= MAX_MEMMAP_REGIONS)
> - return;
> -
> while (str && (i < MAX_MEMMAP_REGIONS)) {
> int rc;
> unsigned long long start, size;
> @@ -206,7 +203,7 @@ static void mem_avoid_memmap(char *str)
> }
>
> /* More than 4 memmaps, fail kaslr */
> - if ((i >= MAX_MEMMAP_REGIONS) && str)
> + if (i >= MAX_MEMMAP_REGIONS && !memmap_too_large)
> memmap_too_large = true;
> }
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists