lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190905134239.fmoknq3z422tflst@treble>
Date:   Thu, 5 Sep 2019 08:42:39 -0500
From:   Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
To:     Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>
Cc:     Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
        Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@...hat.com>,
        Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        live-patching@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] livepatch: Clear relocation targets on a module
 removal

On Thu, Sep 05, 2019 at 03:31:56PM +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Sep 2019, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> 
> > > All the indirect jumps are turned into alternatives when retpolines 
> > > are in place.
> > 
> > Actually in C code those are done by the compiler as calls/jumps to
> > __x86_indirect_thunk_*.
> 
> Sure, and the thunks do the redirection via JMP_NOSPEC / CALL_NOSPEC, 
> which has alternative in it.

But the thunks are isolated to arch/x86/lib/retpoline.S.  We can't patch
that code anyway.

-- 
Josh

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ