[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190905134941.GG1157@kunai>
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2019 15:49:41 +0200
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc: alokc@...eaurora.org, agross@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
mark.rutland@....com, bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, vkoul@...nel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] i2c: qcom-geni: Provide an option to disable DMA
processing
Hi Lee,
I understand you are in a hurry, but please double check before
sending...
On Thu, Sep 05, 2019 at 11:22:47AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> We have a production-level laptop (Lenovo Yoga C630) which is exhibiting
> a rather horrific bug. When I2C HID devices are being scanned for at
> boot-time the QCom Geni based I2C (Serial Engine) attempts to use DMA.
> When it does, the laptop reboots and the user never sees the OS.
>
> The beautiful thing about this approach is that, *if* the Geni SE DMA
> ever starts working, we can remove the C code and any old properties
> left in older DTs just become NOOP. Older kernels with newer DTs (less
> of a priority) *still* will not work - but they do not work now anyway.
... becasue this paragraph doesn't fit anymore. Needs to be reworded.
>
> Fixes: 8bc529b25354 ("soc: qcom: geni: Add support for ACPI")
As said in the other thread, I don't get it, but this is not a show
stopper for me.
> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
> Reviewed-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
I'd like Vinod to resend his review. Because IMO the change since v2 was
not trivial, so the old rev-by has to be dropped.
Other than that, the code looks good to me!
Regards,
Wolfram
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists