linux-kernel - Re: PCI/kernel msi code vs GIC ITS driver conflict?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e14e2b68-1d72-46c7-0255-1b3039d089d7@kernel.org>
Date:   Thu, 5 Sep 2019 16:09:34 +0100
From:   Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To:     John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>,
        Andrew Murray <andrew.murray@....com>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Linux PCI <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linuxarm <linuxarm@...wei.com>,
        "luojiaxing@...wei.com" <luojiaxing@...wei.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: PCI/kernel msi code vs GIC ITS driver conflict?

On 05/09/2019 15:53, John Garry wrote:

[...[

>> Awesome. Can I take this as a Tested-by?
> 
> Sure, btw, could you please also add:
> 
> Reported-by: Jiaxing Luo <luojiaxing@...wei.com>
> 
> ... as he did initial discovery and analysis on the problem.

Sure. Now pushed to irqchip-next.

Thanks,
	
	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead, it just smells funny...