[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7e3e784c-e8e6-f9ba-490f-ec3bf956d96b@web.de>
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2019 17:51:45 +0200
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>, dm-devel@...hat.com,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, rcu@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: sched: make struct task_struct::state 32-bit
> @funcmatch@
> identifier func;
> identifier p;
> identifier state_var;
> @@
>
> func(..., struct task_struct *p, ...
> - , long state_var
> + , int state_var
> ,...)
> {
> ...
> }
…
> Which seems to be doing roughly what I want.
Can a transformation approach like the following work also
for your software?
@replacement@
identifier func, p, state_var;
@@
func(...,
struct task_struct *p,
...
,
- long
+ int
state_var
,
...)
{
...
}
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists