linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.14 00/57] 4.14.142-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 4 Sep 2019 20:48:07 -0700
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:     Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
        "kernelci.org bot" <bot@...nelci.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
        stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.14 00/57] 4.14.142-stable review

On 9/4/19 5:38 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> "kernelci.org bot" <bot@...nelci.org> writes:
> 
>> stable-rc/linux-4.14.y boot: 144 boots: 5 failed, 131 passed with 8 offline (v4.14.141-58-g39a17ab1edd4)
>>
>> Full Boot Summary: https://kernelci.org/boot/all/job/stable-rc/branch/linux-4.14.y/kernel/v4.14.141-58-g39a17ab1edd4/
>> Full Build Summary: https://kernelci.org/build/stable-rc/branch/linux-4.14.y/kernel/v4.14.141-58-g39a17ab1edd4/
>>
>> Tree: stable-rc
>> Branch: linux-4.14.y
>> Git Describe: v4.14.141-58-g39a17ab1edd4
>> Git Commit: 39a17ab1edd4adb3fb732726a36cb54a21cc570d
>> Git URL: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
>> Tested: 68 unique boards, 23 SoC families, 14 builds out of 201
>>
>> Boot Failures Detected:
>>
>> arm:
>>      vexpress_defconfig:
>>          gcc-8:
>>              qemu_arm-virt-gicv3: 5 failed labs
> 
> All 5 failures are for this same QEMU target in multiple labs
> 
> It is also failing in linux-next and on several other stable versions.
> 

linux-next is in bad shape due to some usb issues, but I am not sure otherwise.
I ran a quick test on 4.14.y-queue, and all my (arm, arm64) qemu tests are fine.

Is it possible that this is a new or modified test ?

Guenter