[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <86b48953-69a2-c211-2b48-b796c07426bc@shipmail.org>
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2019 18:40:59 +0200
From: Thomas Hellström (VMware)
<thomas_os@...pmail.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, pv-drivers@...are.com,
Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@...are.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] x86: Don't let pgprot_modify() change the page
encryption bit
On 9/5/19 5:24 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 05, 2019 at 05:21:24PM +0200, Thomas Hellström (VMware) wrote:
>> On 9/5/19 4:15 PM, Dave Hansen wrote:
>>> Hi Thomas,
>>>
>>> Thanks for the second batch of patches! These look much improved on all
>>> fronts.
>> Yes, although the TTM functionality isn't in yet. Hopefully we won't have to
>> bother you with those though, since this assumes TTM will be using the dma
>> API.
> Please take a look at dma_mmap_prepare and dma_mmap_fault in this
> branch:
>
> http://git.infradead.org/users/hch/misc.git/shortlog/refs/heads/dma-mmap-improvements
>
> they should allow to fault dma api pages in the page fault handler. But
> this is totally hot off the press and not actually tested for the last
> few patches. Note that I've also included your two patches from this
> series to handle SEV.
Thanks, Christoph.
I'll get to this tomorrow.
/Thomas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists