[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87blvzpf4q.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au>
Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2019 13:59:33 +1000
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
To: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>, Nayna Jain <nayna@...ux.ibm.com>,
linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Jeremy Kerr <jk@...abs.org>,
Matthew Garret <matthew.garret@...ula.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Claudio Carvalho <cclaudio@...ux.ibm.com>,
George Wilson <gcwilson@...ux.ibm.com>,
Elaine Palmer <erpalmer@...ibm.com>,
Eric Ricther <erichte@...ux.ibm.com>,
Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@...il.com>,
Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...oraproject.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] x86/efi: move common keyring handler functions to new file
Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com> writes:
> (Cc'ing Josh Boyer, David Howells)
>
> On Mon, 2019-09-02 at 21:55 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>> Nayna Jain <nayna@...ux.ibm.com> writes:
>>
>> > The handlers to add the keys to the .platform keyring and blacklisted
>> > hashes to the .blacklist keyring is common for both the uefi and powerpc
>> > mechanisms of loading the keys/hashes from the firmware.
>> >
>> > This patch moves the common code from load_uefi.c to keyring_handler.c
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Nayna Jain <nayna@...ux.ibm.com>
>
> Acked-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>
>
>> > ---
>> > security/integrity/Makefile | 3 +-
>> > .../platform_certs/keyring_handler.c | 80 +++++++++++++++++++
>> > .../platform_certs/keyring_handler.h | 32 ++++++++
>> > security/integrity/platform_certs/load_uefi.c | 67 +---------------
>> > 4 files changed, 115 insertions(+), 67 deletions(-)
>> > create mode 100644 security/integrity/platform_certs/keyring_handler.c
>> > create mode 100644 security/integrity/platform_certs/keyring_handler.h
>>
>> This has no acks from security folks, though I'm not really clear on who
>> maintains those files.
>
> I upstreamed David's, Josh's, and Nayna's patches, so that's probably
> me.
>
>> Do I take it because it's mostly just code movement people are OK with
>> it going in via the powerpc tree?
>
> Yes, the only reason for splitting load_uefi.c is for powerpc. These
> patches should be upstreamed together.
Thanks.
cheers
Powered by blists - more mailing lists