[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5d72c439.1c69fb81.484c6.fe28@mx.google.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2019 13:40:24 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
To: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
Cc: Jack Pham <jackp@...eaurora.org>,
Jorge Ramirez <jorge.ramirez-ortiz@...aro.org>,
robh@...nel.org, andy.gross@...aro.org, shawn.guo@...aro.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, mark.rutland@....com, kishon@...com,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, khasim.mohammed@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] dt-bindings: Add Qualcomm USB SuperSpeed PHY bindings
Quoting Bjorn Andersson (2019-09-06 11:25:30)
> On Thu 05 Sep 22:26 PDT 2019, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>
> >
> > Yes this looks like the approach that should be taken. One question
> > though, is this a micro-b connector or a type-c connector on the board?
> > I thought it was a type-c, so then this USB gpio based connection driver
> > isn't an exact fit?
> >
>
> For this particular case it's a type c connector, but the port
> controller is operated completely passively (and there's no PD or DP
> involved), so the GPIO based approach seems like a good fit.
>
OK. Perhaps the binding needs an update then to have another compatible
string indicating type-c connector that's not able to support PD or DP?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists