[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190906091151.GA311@linux-8mug>
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2019 09:12:14 +0000
From: Chester Lin <clin@...e.com>
To: Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>
CC: Chester Lin <clin@...e.com>,
"rick@...estech.com" <rick@...estech.com>,
"merker@...ian.org" <merker@...ian.org>,
"aou@...s.berkeley.edu" <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
"marek.vasut@...il.com" <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
"palmer@...ive.com" <palmer@...ive.com>,
"paul.walmsley@...ive.com" <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Anup.Patel@....com" <Anup.Patel@....com>,
"atish.patra@....com" <atish.patra@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] riscv: save space on the magic number field of image
header
Hi Anup,
On Fri, Sep 06, 2019 at 01:50:37PM +0530, Anup Patel wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 12:50 PM Chester Lin <clin@...e.com> wrote:
> >
> > Change the symbol from "RISCV" to "RSCV" so the magic number can be 32-bit
> > long, which is consistent with other architectures.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chester Lin <clin@...e.com>
> > ---
> > arch/riscv/include/asm/image.h | 9 +++++----
> > arch/riscv/kernel/head.S | 5 ++---
> > 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/image.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/image.h
> > index ef28e106f247..ec8bbfe86dde 100644
> > --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/image.h
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/image.h
> > @@ -3,7 +3,8 @@
> > #ifndef __ASM_IMAGE_H
> > #define __ASM_IMAGE_H
> >
> > -#define RISCV_IMAGE_MAGIC "RISCV"
> > +#define RISCV_IMAGE_MAGIC "RSCV"
> > +
> >
> > #define RISCV_IMAGE_FLAG_BE_SHIFT 0
> > #define RISCV_IMAGE_FLAG_BE_MASK 0x1
> > @@ -39,9 +40,9 @@
> > * @version: version
> > * @res1: reserved
> > * @res2: reserved
> > - * @magic: Magic number
> > * @res3: reserved (will be used for additional RISC-V specific
> > * header)
> > + * @magic: Magic number
> > * @res4: reserved (will be used for PE COFF offset)
> > *
> > * The intention is for this header format to be shared between multiple
> > @@ -57,8 +58,8 @@ struct riscv_image_header {
> > u32 version;
> > u32 res1;
> > u64 res2;
> > - u64 magic;
> > - u32 res3;
> > + u64 res3;
> > + u32 magic;
> > u32 res4;
> > };
> > #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/head.S b/arch/riscv/kernel/head.S
> > index 0f1ba17e476f..1f8fffbecf68 100644
> > --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/head.S
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/head.S
> > @@ -39,9 +39,8 @@ ENTRY(_start)
> > .word RISCV_HEADER_VERSION
> > .word 0
> > .dword 0
> > - .asciz RISCV_IMAGE_MAGIC
> > - .word 0
> > - .balign 4
> > + .dword 0
> > + .ascii RISCV_IMAGE_MAGIC
> > .word 0
> >
> > .global _start_kernel
> > --
> > 2.22.0
> >
>
> This change is not at all backward compatible with
> existing booti implementation in U-Boot.
>
> It changes:
> 1. Magic offset
> 2. Magic value itself
>
Thank you for the reminder. I have submitted a patch to U-Boot as well. Since
my email post to the uboot mailing list is still under review by the list
moderator, here I just list my code change of uboot:
diff --git a/arch/riscv/lib/image.c b/arch/riscv/lib/image.c
index d063beb7df..e8a8cb7190 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/lib/image.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/lib/image.c
@@ -14,8 +14,8 @@
DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR;
-/* ASCII version of "RISCV" defined in Linux kernel */
-#define LINUX_RISCV_IMAGE_MAGIC 0x5643534952
+/* ASCII version of "RSCV" defined in Linux kernel */
+#define LINUX_RISCV_IMAGE_MAGIC 0x56435352
struct linux_image_h {
uint32_t code0; /* Executable code */
@@ -25,8 +25,8 @@ struct linux_image_h {
uint64_t res1; /* reserved */
uint64_t res2; /* reserved */
uint64_t res3; /* reserved */
- uint64_t magic; /* Magic number */
- uint32_t res4; /* reserved */
+ uint64_t res4; /* reserved */
+ uint32_t magic; /* Magic number */
uint32_t res5; /* reserved */
};
> We don't see this header changing much apart from
> res1/res2 becoming flags in-future. The PE COFF header
> will be append to this header in-future and it will have lot
> more information.
>
I think a smaller magic field will let res4 have more room [32bit->64bit], which
could offer more options for RISC-V's boot-flow development in the future. This
change also synchronizes with arm64's image header.
> Regards,
> Anup
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists