[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190906104403.GH2672@vkoul-mobl>
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2019 16:14:03 +0530
From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Sanyog Kale <sanyog.r.kale@...el.com>,
Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>,
ALSA Development Mailing List <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] soundwire: add back ACPI dependency
On 06-09-19, 12:02, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 6:39 AM Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On 05-09-19, 22:35, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > Soundwire gained a warning for randconfig builds without
> > > CONFIG_ACPI during the linux-5.3-rc cycle:
> > >
> > > drivers/soundwire/slave.c:16:12: error: unused function 'sdw_slave_add' [-Werror,-Wunused-function]
> > >
> > > Add the CONFIG_ACPI dependency at the top level now.
> >
> > Did you run this yesterday or today. I have applied Srini's patches to
> > add DT support for Soundwire couple of days back so we should not see
> > this warning anymore
>
> This is on the latest linux-next, which is dated 20190904. As Stephen is
> not releasing any more linux-next kernels until later this month, I'm
> missing anything that came in afterwards.
That is interesting as next-20190904 has the DT changes :) Can you share
the config you used to get this.
I have two instances of sdw_slave_add() in next-20190904:
drivers/soundwire/slave.c: sdw_slave_add(bus, &id, acpi_fwnode_handle(adev));
drivers/soundwire/slave.c: sdw_slave_add(bus, &id, of_fwnode_handle(node));
Thanks
--
~Vinod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists