[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFqt6zYkFk55gzmfwMFzpWiOp0xP3DXdmWyO2Ce8+mqYW12SNw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2019 17:57:19 +0530
From: Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@...il.com>
To: konrad.wilk@...cle.com,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>, sstabellini@...nel.org
Cc: xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Sabyasachi Gupta <sabyasachi.linux@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] swiotlb-xen: Convert to use macro
On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 2:04 PM Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Rather than using static int max_dma_bits, this
> can be coverted to use as macro.
>
> Signed-off-by: Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@...il.com>
> Reviewed-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
If it is still not late, can we get this patch in queue for 5.4 ?
> ---
> drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c | 5 ++---
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c b/drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c
> index ae1df49..d1eced5 100644
> --- a/drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c
> +++ b/drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c
> @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@
> #include <asm/xen/page-coherent.h>
>
> #include <trace/events/swiotlb.h>
> +#define MAX_DMA_BITS 32
> /*
> * Used to do a quick range check in swiotlb_tbl_unmap_single and
> * swiotlb_tbl_sync_single_*, to see if the memory was in fact allocated by this
> @@ -114,8 +115,6 @@ static int is_xen_swiotlb_buffer(dma_addr_t dma_addr)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static int max_dma_bits = 32;
> -
> static int
> xen_swiotlb_fixup(void *buf, size_t size, unsigned long nslabs)
> {
> @@ -135,7 +134,7 @@ static int is_xen_swiotlb_buffer(dma_addr_t dma_addr)
> p + (i << IO_TLB_SHIFT),
> get_order(slabs << IO_TLB_SHIFT),
> dma_bits, &dma_handle);
> - } while (rc && dma_bits++ < max_dma_bits);
> + } while (rc && dma_bits++ < MAX_DMA_BITS);
> if (rc)
> return rc;
>
> --
> 1.9.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists