linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] docs: license-rules.txt: cover SPDX headers on Python scripts

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 6 Sep 2019 11:45:52 -0300
From:   Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>
To:     Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...radead.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Jessica Yu <jeyu@...nel.org>,
        Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@...a.pv.it>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: license-rules.txt: cover SPDX headers on Python
 scripts

Em Fri, 06 Sep 2019 05:20:30 -0700
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> escreveu:

> On Fri, 2019-09-06 at 08:34 -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > I did some changes on it, plus one change at the pedantic mode of
> > scripts/spdxcheck.py, and placed the corresponding patches at:
> > 
> > 	https://git.linuxtv.org/mchehab/experimental.git/log/?h=spdx_pedantic  
> 
> Overall seems very nice, thanks.
> 
> Couple nits.
> 
> Some of the scripts and py files move the author
> block into a description or add unnecessary blank
> comments.  These may use some manual fixups.

True. I noticed that too. I suspect that fixing this automatically would 
make the script too complex.

Anyway, the point is: who will apply it? Linus? Each maintainer?

I can apply it to the media subsystem (after applying the patches I have 
already doing the same), but I don't intend myself to apply it to the other
subsystems.

> > what's the "very first line" where a
> > SPDX header tag should be on a man page?  
> 
> Beats me.
> This says man pages are documents,
> https://spdx.org/rdf/ontology/spdx-2-0-rev-7/individuals/usageType_document___85292652.html
> 
> 

Yes. I mean, I suspect that a troff file should have a ".TH" at its
first line. So, SPDX header should start at the second line.



Thanks,
Mauro