linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] docs: mtd: Update spi nor reference driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 6 Sep 2019 15:10:36 +0000
From:   <Tudor.Ambarus@...rochip.com>
To:     <corbet@....net>, <john.garry@...wei.com>
CC:     <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>, <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <frieder.schrempf@...tron.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: mtd: Update spi nor reference driver



On 09/06/2019 06:03 PM, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Sep 2019 15:58:41 +0100
> John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com> wrote:
> 
>> I don't think that it was appropriate to apply this patch in the end - 
>> maybe this could have been communicated better. If you check the 
>> subsequent discussion in this thread, it seems that completely new 
>> documentation is required:
>>
>> "Actually it seems like the whole file is obsolete and needs to be
>> removed or replaced by proper documentation of the SPI MEM API."
>>
>> But nothing seems to be happening there...
> 
> Ah, OK, I lost track of that somewhere along the way.
> 
> Unless you object I'll leave it applied, it's not going to do any harm,
> methinks.
> 

We can rework the documentation on top of this, no worries.

Cheers,
ta