linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: intel: hide unused intel_pin_to

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 6 Sep 2019 19:59:32 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:     Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Chris Chiu <chiu@...lessm.com>,
        Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@...onical.com>,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: intel: hide unused intel_pin_to_gpio

On Fri, Sep 06, 2019 at 05:26:01PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> The intel_pin_to_gpio() function is only called by the
> PM support functions and causes a warning when those are disabled:
> 
> drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-intel.c:841:12: error: unused function 'intel_pin_to_gpio' [-Werror,-Wunused-function]
> 
> As we cannot change the PM functions themselves to use __maybe_unused,
> add another #ifdef here for consistency.

It's not adding another #ifdef here...

Nevertheless, I'm afraid that in the future we might need this in other
place(s). Can we add __maybe_unused to this function exclusively?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko